Posts Tagged ‘revolution



19
Jan
15

Failure to Ask: Why?


why

Preamble: The following essay is an effort to expunge the frustration that wells-up within as I make an effort to discern with the view to understand, the war-driven evil that is eroding civil and free social-order not only here in Canada but, throughout global civil-society.

Unfortunately, to approach an understanding of the current state of affairs in the context of heightened national security, challenges to freedom of expression and, migration of the so-named `war on terror’ throughout western democratic nations; it is essential to delve into the relative, contemporary roots of these developments. In truth, a comprehensive examination would demand unearthing contributing factors arising well back into modern, human history at least to the beginning of the 20th century.

The complexity of what has materialized to-date is enormous given that many elements contribute to current manifestations of conflict primarily in the Middle East, that now appear to be migrating toward Europe, the United States and Canada. However, ultimately, the genesis to these conflicts rests solely with the collective alliance of these same named national governments. Their principal motivations being expansionism for the security and control of global natural resources namely but, not limited to Oil to ensure their economic and military dominance against their perceived enemies: China, Russia and lesser nations that are equally competing for such power of dominance.

The former Soviet Union’s attempt to secure Afghanistan beginning in 1979 became a threat to western commercial interests in that its success would impede installation of oil and natural gas pipelines from resource-rich, land-locked nations such as Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan to flow ultimately through western ally nation Pakistan to coastal ports of the Indian Ocean. The United States with the acquiescence if not participation of its coalition of nation-partners, funded and trained local tribesmen to counter the Soviet insurgence. These fighters, under the leadership of now deceased Osama bin Ladin, known as al-Qaida, after nine-years of conflict ending February, 1989, successfully routed-out the Soviets. This left war-torn Afghanistan essentially, under the influences of western-nations’ political and corporate interests.

Shortly thereafter, in 1990, Saddam Hussein of Iraq attempted to invade Kuwait for the purported purpose of securing its oil reserves. The United States saw this as a direct threat against an ally nation and source of its oil imports, launched a major counter-offensive literally obliterating the Iraqi army and air-force. Though the war lasted only a matter of weeks, rightly or wrongly, President Hubert-Walker Bush decided not to overthrow and/or remove Saddam Hussein from power.

The next major international event to occurred happened September 11, 2001 (9/11) with the downing of the World Trade Centre towers. Blamed for the attack yet never fully investigated were a group of nineteen named terrorists purportedly operating under direction of Osama bin Laden orchestrating the attack from inside Afghanistan.

The 9/11 event spawned a reaction that is felt to this day commencing with the pronouncement by President George W. Bush: a `war-on-terror’ against`axis-of-evil’ countries; countries the United States claim finance and support terrorist groups; a `coalition-of-the-willing’ namely western, democratic States of Britain, majority of European Union countries and Canada. What ensued as result, is the relentless bombing of Afghanistan to rout-out bin Laden and, in March, 2003, outright war against Saddam Hussein based on what will ultimately be found to be false accusations Saddam harbored terrorist groups and attempts to acquire `weapons of mass destruction’ (W.D.M.’s).

In concert with these military initiatives; the early part of the 21st century  witnessed the unbridled legalizing of limitations imposed on the freedoms of United States citizens by way of the Patriot Act and creation of the Department of Homeland Security and Transportation Security Agency (T.S.A.) for implementation of a variety of draconian legislation premised on the need to tighten boarder security from outside terrorist threats. The occurrence of three well-known terrorist acts in Detroit, New York and Boston respectively, over a period of several years, has heightened the level of pubic fear infused by government propaganda and escalated, mainstream media coverage, substantiating expenditure of billions of dollars to essentially create a national security state broaching that of a military-state. The same initiatives to varying degrees, continue to be implemented within countries allied with the United States in their combined efforts to rid the world of the perceived and limited terrorist menace.

As to who or what was ultimately responsible for the attack on the WTC towers is yet to be determined. Comprehensive analysis of the events leading up to and post the buildings’ collapse has created more questions then has been answered. And, as with the questions arising from the assassination of John F. Kennedy and subsequently his brother Robert, they are likely never to be fully resolved. However, as to the other part of the Middle East war-equation: it is widely known claims of WDM’s held by Saddam Hussein was false and misleading resulting in an illegal and unnecessary destruction of a nation and killing of millions of innocent Iraqi citizens.

The fourteen, now approaching fifteen, years since the 9/11 event, matters have worsened. The failure of the United States and its allies to successfully democratize either Iraq or Afghanistan has these nations mired in a constant state of civil war between sectarian and religious factions of the Suni, Kurd and Shia dominated regions of Iraq; and, various tribal-families of Afghanistan siding with al Quida and/or various factions fighting under the flag of the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) fundamentalist groups.

Compounding and convoluting the chaos in the region is the western-ally supported rebellion in Libya by `revolutionaries’ resulting in the overthrow and death of its notorious dictator-leader, Muammar Gaddafi in October, 2011 leaving Libya fractured and in a continual state of civil-war between various militant and revolutionary forces vying for control. What is not clear: who the western nations look to be victorious since they seem to be militarizing all parties in the conflict in their attempt to destabilize the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, deemed by the West a ruling dictator suppressing the democratic and human-rights of Syrian citizens.

Ultimately, the United States and its allies’ intervention in the region of the Middle East commencing with Iraq and Afghanistan, expands southward to include Yemen and eastward to Pakistan (though Pakistan is deemed an ally of the west, it is a known haven and fund various extremist deemed terrorist factions). Beyond these countries and throughout the Middle East including Egypt, Palestine, Lebanon, Jordan and those of the Sinai Peninsula, Emirate States and Saudi Arabia have become increasingly embroiled either directly or at arms-length, in the conflict(s) of present day and, not to the exclusion of Israel’s participation.

As eluded to earlier, the complexity of this important matter is beyond the capacity of this essay to comprehensively encapsulate however, it should be sufficient to emphasize the importance of everyone, of all nations, to make an effort to enquire and question the actions and motivations of its political elite in their pursuance of tighter and more stringent legislative powers to inhibit the freedoms of its citizenry. Periodic manifestation of so-called `terrorist’ acts on `home-soil’ or, domestic-terrorism, should not lead to questions of `what manner of tighter security need be implemented?’ but, more importantly: `why did the terrorist(s) feel it necessary to commit such acts of death and destruction on home-soil?’.

The mainstream-media fail in pursuing this line of questioning of legislators and politicians but rather, fall lock-step in support by emphasizing the fear-element of the controversy and call for tighter legislative powers to secure against the perceived threat at the expense of freedom of expression and movement.

There can be no doubt even with the limited public knowledge of this on-going conflict made available through mainstream-media-channels; the actions of western nations principally those of the United States substantiated by the attack of 9/11 serves only to precipitate and fuel the level of hatred arising from what is deemed strategic and targeted bombing by plane and drones in many of the Islamic countries of the Middle East. These actions seem to only create more terrorist acts of retribution against nations comprising the coalition countries. An unfair condition not only for the Islamic citizens affected but too, those of western nations as it is their treasure and blood being expended in this seemingly endless battle.

In the end, there is no right or wrong to this situation; it is more a matter of a conflict that has become convoluted by ambitions of politics/politicians and the economics of power both domestic and international.

Putting on a pair of rose-colored glasses:

  1. It is time for ALL global-citizens to question WHY? our respective nations are involved in these conflicts and to demand withdraw from any region we have no right to be involved;
  2. Let the citizens of countries in domestic-conflict sort out their own future and neighboring nations left to protect their own sovereign borders from intrusion as may arise from such conflicts;
  3. Treat the natural resources of any nation as the common-wealth of the sovereign-nation for trade/exchange in good faith; and,
  4. Larger, developed nations to better serve as peace-makers/brokers and not interventionist for securing other nations’ natural wealth.

Peace – what are you/we waiting for?

12
Jan
15

What is: Freedom of Speech in the 21st Century


The events transpiring in France as of late, have prompted examination of the concept of freedom of expression/speech. But, what constitutes or differentiates expression premised on a bias or extreme hatred versus critical expression when based on factual evidence in support of such expression.

For an instance if I were to claim:

 Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, a duplicitous, Fascist, genocidal, racist criminal administering an apartheid state for the occupation and slaughter of innocent Palestinian citizens;

…would this be interpreted as `hate speech’ or my freedom to express my opinion based on interpretation of the factual evidence deemed in support of this claim?

Frankly, I think not. It would likely be labelled as `anti-Semitic’, an accusation directed not at the Politician named but, toward the Peoples of Israel; especially they whom either support or fail to intervene in the criminal actions of their government.

Hypocrisy in the domain of freedom of speech is rampant. Majority of western, so-called democratic countries advocate the right of expression, a pillar among those that define such nations however; anyone with the ability to see, hear and discern what is evident in daily News reporting; knows this is just not true.

The only freedom for assembled citizens to express a viewpoint on topical matters are ONLY those supportive of the current government’s policy. When defiance of it; the militarized, policing authority is there to quash such expression. To cite specific examples of this check the video News archived coverage of any major G-Country meetings; or environmental policy legislation such the X-L Pipeline and climate-change.

The attack on investigative journalistic reporting that runs contrary to a ruling governments’ policies is becoming increasingly substantiated as a matter of national security and potentially harmful to the nation in question. In truth, this means: if the citizens really knew what we [government] were up to there would be a considerable revolt if not outright anarchy!

It is no secret except to those whom chose to bury their heads in the proverbial `sand’; the complicit nature of western societal institutions to present only `their’ perspective to global events. Main-stream media, financial and multi-national corporations being at the top of the list, share equally with respective national governments, to promulgate and support what is increasingly becoming a `conspiracy of dominance’ by national governmental administrations, regardless of political strip. The need to control effective communication of narratives touted as `credible’ information, to a less-than-sublime and gullible general populace.

Any commentary contrary to a nation’s national narrative is quickly labelled a `conspiracy’ of some extremist individual or group, anti-government organization or, manifests as charge(s) of jeopardizing national security and pursuance of reporting journalist(s) by department of justice. Relevant and significant examples of this are Julian Assange of Wiki-Leaks, infamous Edward Snowden both deemed `Wanted-Men’ by the United States Department of Justice and, the recent imprisonment of Chelsea Manning for the better part of his life. The irony in each of these cases: majority of the western populace are in support of the actions taken by such individuals for exposing illegal mass surveillance activity by national security agencies of the United States and their coalition of governmental allies around the world.

Investigative Journalist covering and exposing controversial political matters, intrusive to national security of government administrations around the globe are either: mysteriously killed, imprisoned or, actively pursued by federal prosecutors on national security charges.

Fortunately, with the ubiquitous Internet and predacious nature of freelance journalism, a platform for journalistic activism is flourishing much to the chagrin of nation governments and their respective politicians. Independent, alternative News-media channels are reporting unbiased, factual accounts of many nefarious governmental activities. Exposing the hypocrisy that is rife throughout the spectrum of global governance and socio-economic policy makers.

Unfortunately, recognizing the potential influence such independent news-platforms can impose to counter the national narrative as presented by the main-stream media; strengthened by the increased terrorist-security threat agenda touted as an international concern, a communication policy titled Net-Neutrality is gaining increased support. Basically what this implies is the opportunity for some internet service providers (ISP’s) to fundamentally alter the way the internet works and collect money from companies (like Netflix and Facebook) to guarantee their data can continue to reach users unimpeded. Essentially creating a situation where those who are able to pay will receive preferential, faster service and bandwidth. The unfortunate and possible calculated aspect of this policy is recognition that many of the independent news-media websites are donation supported and, as result, be relegated to poorer and slower service from their ISP if not outright closure. The move could be cynically translated as an arms-length way for governments to further control the information-narrative that flows to its citizenry via the Internet.

The facets that would respond to the original question posed and, the title to this essay:

`What is: Freedom of Speech in the 21st Century’

…in fairness to its critical importance to everyone would, should take several more pages than expressed here. However, advocated by the brief examples cited is the necessity for every individual to become more informed and involved with the circumstances that increasingly shape the world we and our descendants occupy. It is essential to go beyond the sound-bites of information offered by the Main-stream media and equally important, to not accept at face-value all that is presented, to question the validity and veracity of its source(s). This is especially relevant given that a majority of News reported originates from one of only five major news corporations which are more concerned with turning a profit than ensuring you as a voting citizen, know the truth to what is going on beyond your horizon.

In conclusion, the perfunctory or dismissive reaction to this essay-commentary by its potential reader, is not the failing of its communication but, the success of governmental-establishment’s objectives to impede and minimize opportunity for true and honest freedom of speech and for the potential demonization and incarceration of those whom advocate for it!

Naykd Poet, 2015

Watch the following Video by Democracy Now.com:

Too, check out The Real News Network

 

11
Dec
14

Police Out of Control????


police

21
Oct
14

Video Book of Reflective Poetry


bookcover1

A video book: Reflective Poetry

Utilizing the various media tools to our disposal, here is a further attempt to get a volume of writing out, exposed to the whims of those whom come upon it; a consolidation of works from the last few months:

10
Oct
14

The Death Of Innocent Civilians


refugee

 

The deadly game of global chess being played out by the power elites of nations has but one consequence: the death of innocent civilians.

Exploration of the causes/issues that manifest into conflict over the centuries be it regional, national or international; more often than not are the contrivance of pro- or anti– factions to an ideology premised on theocracy, democracy or autocracy and variant machinations thereof.

However, more significant are they whom, above the fray, are the ultimate and true authors, purveyors to these conflicts who recognize and utilize the variants in ideology to their optimum benefit; be the motivation to attain supreme power of control of the mechanistic aspects of global social order or more fundamentally, control of global currency.

Recognizing that every system is inherently defined by a hierarchical structure, often represented as a pyramid; it is inevitable that within the matrix of the grand pyramid structure, comprised of a multitude of sub-system, pyramidal structures, each representing an element of power in its own right becomes source to potential conflict.

Essentially on examination of the quagmire that is the conflict in the Middle East, this is exactly what is transpiring.

Representing the ideology of democracy, grand pyramidal structure in the Middle East conflict is the United States under the auspicious of a Coalition of  Nations (though this grouping can be confidently deemed but a sub-system structure to yet a higher order of power often alluded to as the Power Elite or Ghost Global Governance; reputed authors to the New World Order).

Representing the ideology of theocracy, grand pyramidal structure in the Middle East conflict is presumed to be Islamic Muslims however, in reality, it essentially is non-existent. This conclusion is in recognition of Islam not being a monolithic (religious) organization but rather, is comprised of eight recognized sects within the Middle East, namely: (Source: http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/muslims-adhere-to-different-islamic-sects.html)

Sunni Muslims include 84%–90% of all Muslims. Sunni means “tradition,” and Sunnis regard themselves as those who emphasize following the traditions of Muhammad and of the first two generations of the community of Muslims that followed Muhammad.

A number of movements to reform Islam have originated mainly in the 20th century. Some are limited to one country and others have a broader influence. Most are Sunni movements, such as the Wahhabis, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Jama`at-i-Islami.

Shi`ite Muslims comprise 10%–16% of all Muslims. Shi`ites are the “party of `Ali,” who believe that Muhammad’s son-in-law `Ali was his designated successor (imam) and that the Muslim community should be headed by a designated descendent of Muhammad. Three main subgroups of Shi`ites are Twelvers (Ithna-`Asharis), Seveners (Isma`ilis), and Fivers (Zaydis).

Sufis are Islamic mystics. Sufis go beyond external requirements of the religion to seek a personal experience of God through forms of meditation and spiritual growth. A number of Sufi orders, comparable to Christian monastic orders, exist. Most Sufis are also Sunni Muslims, although some are Shi`ite Muslims. Many conservative Sunni Muslims regard Sufism as a corruption of Islam, although most still regard Sufis as Muslims.

Baha’is and Ahmadiyyas are 19th-century offshoots of Shi`ite and Sunni Islam, respectively. Bahai’s consider themselves the newest of the major world’s religions but recognize that historically they originated from Shi`ite Islam in the same way that Christianity originated from Judaism. Ahmadiyyas do regard themselves as Muslims. Most other Muslims, however, deny that either group is a legitimate form of Islam and regard members of both groups as heretics — people who have corrupted and abandoned Islamic belief and practice.

Druze, Alevis, and `Alawis are small, sectarian groups with unorthodox beliefs and practices that split off from Islam. Druze and Alevis do not regard themselves as Muslims and are not considered Muslims by other Muslims. `Alawis have various non-Islamic practices, but debate continues as to whether they should still be considered Muslims.

Then, there is Wahabi & Salafi religions of the Arab States and ultimately, this Sect has four names SALAFI, WAHABI, NAJDI and AHL-HADITH – although today they prefer to call themselves Salafi. (Source: http://www.alahazrat.net/islam/wahabi-salafi.php).

Adding to the fray and confusion are the presence of Israeli Jews, Christians and Muslims and variant fundamentalist orthodoxies within each identifiable sect.

This fragmentation of theological ideology is but one, if not easiest to identify components to the complexity being encountered by the purveyors and pursuers of democratic ideology into the Middle East region.

Historically and currently, human societal order of the Middle East is premised on the concept of Tribalism; each tribe having a designated leader who in-turn, participates in a regional council of tribal leaders. For a fuller explanation of the subject refer to `The Middle East’s Tribal DNA’ (http://www.meforum.org/1813/the-middle-easts-tribal-dna).

Given the nature of societal order within the Middle East being so divergent from that of democratically idealized Western culture nations, renders it an intellectually impossible concept to phantom western-style democracy ever taking root. It is conceivable that a form of parliamentary governance for day-to-day management of such things as public works, tax collection, health-care and other generalized societal organs however, this would likely always be subordinate to the individual Tribal Councils from each province comprising the nation as a whole.

In conclusion; bearing in mind the original, stated premise `every system is inherently defined by a hierarchical structure, often represented as a pyramid; …the grand pyramid structure…’; what is attempted here to clarify; the divergent differences of the two principle facets (factions) to the Middle East conflict, namely; the democratic ideology: an organized grand pyramidal structure versus; theological ideology not nor likely to every be an equivalent structure; the satisfactory outcome will likely be forever indeterminate. And, until this is recognized by those at the top of the grand of grand pyramids pursuing and ensuing these battles, they will conceivably be without end with only one major consequence: the death of innocent civilians.

Immersed in the history treading madness that is this earthly existence, questioning the irrational rationality that yields no qualitative answer evokes emotions beyond description; fomenting a resolve toward disengagement of intellectual processes’ attempt to decipher reason toward objective definition of humanity’s purpose of being within the context of principles of synergistic, symbiotic relevance speculated to be the orchestrated product of a divine, omnipresent  ethereal entity; an arguably acceptable theory that is proving to be failing

 

06
Oct
14

complicit defiance


 

 

Defiant seems the charm to elicit;

Communication of words that solicit;

Path toward self-destruction, where all are complicit;

To a dire global future that is about to visit.

 

Resistance to this worldly understanding;

Will not undo what fate it is commanding;

Unless humanity takes a pervasive and firm standing;

For revolutionary change  decisively and, forcefully  demanding.

 

Futile as it may seem, the effort to change;

Increasingly is the imperative to arrange;

Otherwise, what now may seem all too strange;

Will fall within normality’s unacceptable, permanent range.

 

01
Oct
14

Purpose In Creation


creation

Inspired by a talk given by Matthew Fox, not the actor but  American Episcopal priest and theologian

Purpose In Creation

Washed from the incipient minds of generational youth;
The proven though mystical, spiritual wisdom of the past,
Systematically euthanized, obliterated from reality’s realm,
Sublimated by mechanistic values, redefining existence,
Transitioning, by times passage, toward general acceptance
Of a singularity that eludes humanity’s native purpose in Creation.

The future to this pervasive truth is humanity’s ultimate, global defeat:
Erosion of empathy toward idealism of callous disregard;
Diffusion of the precept that Earth is an eco-system;
A synergistic, cellular embodiment essential for creation of life
Enlisting acceptance to the ultimate spiritual truth:

Extinction to one facet of Being derives death for ALL!

24
Sep
14

revolt to the system


revolt

 

The following is in response to the  attached video from Acronym independent News channel discussing the coming economic instigated Peoples’ revolution.

Following are writings I produced over the past several years raising the same alarms and thought I would share them to gain YOUR response to what you feel is to be the outcome of growing economic in-equality:

 

Revolt To The System

Limitless is the breadth and width of the mind
When thought to word one does find
Speaking to injustice and despair be inclined
For others to hear, your words they find
Truth to their meaning, evidence defined
Not messaged to serve up as kind
But brutal at times, if not to remind
That revolt to the system, may have found its time

 

Human Revolution

Different realities co-exist in the same time and space
Each marked by the goodness of love or pain of suffering, faced
A global view of the world’s condition at any second of the clock
Increasing enlists feelings of great sadness and horrifying shock
Injustices expressed by the few of power on the impoverished many
If not soon curtailed, of life on Earth, there will not be any
Rhetoric espoused by those whom the populace elect
Promise, once in political office, these problems they will correct
Yet decades into centuries continue to unfold
And yet the same original story continues to be told
What will it take to derive these problems final solution?
As things stand in this moment – only an uprising – a Human Revolution

Last Chance Revolution – Lost?
(August,2010)

In the shallow shadow of the conspiracy theorist, I submit to you the following scenario:

Firstly, I think we can all admit and accept the planet no, more accurately, the planet’s tenants are becoming increasingly agitated. It is evident in every sector and system that affects our daily lives: weather, finance, economy, morality, etc, etc.. The debate that has ensued is, `Is this by design or destiny of fate?’.

In an attempt to address this question from the perspective of the present 2010 looking retrospectively forward, one might conclude: by design!

The impetus to all that appears to be occurring is the sublimation to servitude achieved by perpetrated, induced fear of a ghostly threat, only to achieve the ultimate goal of `imperial control’. That gives rise on how best to achieve this end.

The inception of the Internet has to be the grease that turned this massive wheel of deception and tyranny.

Through out history especially modern history, the government intelligence community is easily traced to assassinations, coups, and other mischievous activities to attain the goals of the ruling power (democratic or otherwise). Well it is well known to all how the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) have had their hands dirty by the most insidious and corrupt affairs of both domestic and international politics that leads to the focus on domestic political affairs within the realm of the global oligarchy. In effect who is controlling whom?

To make the point clearer I suggest the analogy of the `ponsi-scheme’ that I am sure in light of the current financial system debacle most are familiar with the term; well, that is what the global oligarch from the top-down, represents that is, a myriad of power groups are layered ever upward to yet another, then another to in the end does anyone know who controls whom since the membership amongst the very senior of these strata are all of the same family lineage – an inter-marriage of power through ultimate, yet yielding to when enforced upon, power.

By introduction and retailing of the Internet saw the incredible growth in both the software and hardware industry increasingly geared toward `social networking’ whereby the unbridled, unconscious relinquishing of typically sensitive, private and confidential information on the deception of being close to family and friends. The growth of global tracking or geosynchronous positioning satellite system and technologies or G.P.S., compounded by electronic banking and diminishing of hard currency transactions at the retail, consumer level, all in combination had the general populations masses totally under there control. The next step was the installation of the `fear factor’.

The icon date: September 11, 2001 infamously known as 9/11, was the catalysts to this objective. The destruction of the United States financial icon of global financial superiority rivaling that of Wall Street, along with a reputed three-thousand fatalities, was horrific enough to the then coddled, protected and naive to the horrors of conflict general population, they immediately succumb to the whims and wants of the powers that be, from that date forward. The two major conflicts that followed against Iraq and Afghanistan were precipitous to the financial collapse of the fiat monetary system and the major world banks up to but not including the international, central banks putting the entire global financial, monetary and economic power in the hands of the oligarchy.

The obvious question that comes to mind is where were the people during this time – the activists, the rebelling youth of the time, how did they allow this to flourish? The few youth of the new millennium that saw through the charade were too few in number to stand-up effectively against the increasingly militarized, interwoven departments of police and military security under the central control of the Homeland security establishments. The majority of youth were oblivious to what was happening around them being far too consumed with Internet based networking socializing, video games and other diversionary, established activities. One could say they unwittingly submitted to the slaughter of the civil and human rights coached there by mindless diversions.

Given what has been stated above, the following is my hypothesis of what is yet to come:

The present year is 2010 and the current western demographic has the majority of adult population being those born post WWII. The average age of this group is between their early to mid-sixties. This group is comprised typically of well-educated and financially successful and established individuals of means and those who are most immediately venerable to the uncontrollable effects of down-sizing affected by design, by the oligarchy as per the above outline. It is this group that I believe are the last hope to initiate or motivate a revolt on the increasingly evident plans for dominance by the oligarchy. Yet sadly it is my belief this group, having grown fat, satisfied and mentally lazy are about to too, relinquish any form of resistance to what they consider a power too big to fight.

In summation, the prospects for dark and forlorn days ahead is only in the eyes of those who `see it coming’ yet are to few in number to change this perceived course. All those remaining are oblivious as will be their prodigy, not sensing or aware of the changes that are taking place as they naively consume a contrived, virtual life existence: the fuel energy to power the oligarchy machine (not unlike that depicted in the movie `The Matrix’).

Things To Come

Upon reflection of the words that I have written
I can admit that I have been smitten
By the need to express my view
To communicate a message to all and you

I know they are common words, simple at times
And they annoyingly seem to rhyme
But that should not dismiss the message
The vestige – Of things to come

I hold many secrets within my self
Many that could render extreme wealth
Yet I do not hold to these material things
For it is not joy of life they bring

The Earth revolves with unending vigour
Its meaning in space is for its inhabitants to figure
But not to be dismissed as routine of presence
But to question its perceived infinite significance.

I channel this wisdom from unknown place
Unknown too is why I am graced
I leave the reason for others to contrive
Knowing it will continue as long as I am alive

Others my find my spelling hard to heed
Best they will or assuredly bleed
The blood that fuels mankind
Ground soaked will be left behind

There exists a destiny of less dismay
Will humanity give it chance to play?
Present greed of power, anger and hate
Leaves little to debate

Hindsight is often the test
Differentiating speculation from the rest
My virtue of mind and wrote
Is mine before death to gloat?

 

If you find these writings inspirational or wish to read more on the topic my self-published book HOMAGE TO A WORLD LOST would be of interest to you. You can check it and other of my BOOKs

 

21
Sep
14

climate march and summit – new york sept 21-23 2014


 

climate

The disastrous affects climate change is having on global environment and the reluctance of nation governments to take radical action by succumbing to the pressures of multi-national corporations is demanding affirmative action by the citizenry of this Earth. To awaken those still in denial to the reality being lived today and the massively, deteriorating conditions as yet to be experienced.

 

Democracy Now.com provides a live-stream of the New York City, Peoples March Sunday September 21, 2014   

Documentary titled DECEPTION  chronicles the 100 days of organizing and planning what is expected to be the largest Peoples march to voice international environmental concerns derived by climate change.

I offer these words of poetry to voice this concern:

Climate Changed?

The ferocity of the storm brewed
The sky stirring ever darker, we knew
The deluge of rain and ice pellets to fall
Will leave their mark of hardship for all

The minutes seem to pass like hours
Finally thunderous clouds let loose their showers
Each droplet falling hit its target with a crushing thud
The ground saturated becoming wet beyond mud

The speeding winds’ howling sounded eerily of train whistles
Branches from fallen trees flying like guided missiles
The horrendous damage this vile weather will ultimately inflict
Once the storm finally over, a ruinous sight left to make one sick

Many voicing the claim severe climate-change is Man-made
Does little to remedy the loss of all that a Life has saved
What this growing global weather phaenomenon does enlist
Is for humanity to rethink its presence if on Earth, it wishes to exist

 

The following is an essay written January 2010 when the topic was being hotly debated in the media:

 

Speculation To The Source of Global Warming and Climate Change (Jan 19,2010)

Hypothesis: Current global warming and resulting changes in climatic conditions can be aligned to observable and measurable shifting of the Earth’s magnetic poles and the influence of solar activity as result of this shift.

Firstly, the progressive change (1600-2005) in the position of the North Magnetic Pole (NMP) from the Hudson Bay Region, Canada toward Central Plateau of Siberia, Russia indicates a measurable movement of the planet in a north to south direction1 with a measurable diminishing of magnetic field intensity over the northern region of Canada while increasing over northern Russia that in turn influences the affects of solar radiation on global temperature in these regions respectively.

The pole shift is projected to continue to move for reasons associated with cosmic phenomena projected to occur in the period leading up to 2013 as related to the Sun’s solar cycle2 as well as the galactic alignment of the Earth, Moon and Sun as the planets cross the Galactic Equinox3.

Evidence: The following factors are presented as evidence to support this hypothesis:

The NMP recorded movement during the period of 1600 to 2005 has been progressively from the Hudson Bay region, Canada toward The Central Plateau Siberian region, Russia4. Correspondingly too, the South Magnetic Pole (SMP) has moved measurably from a northeastern region in 1590, in a northwesterly direction, to just off the north-central shore of Antarctica projected for 20105.

The overall intensity of the magnetic field has decreased. In 1600 there was a more distinct intensity over northern Canada. Over the centuries this has weakened, while increasing over the last century in northern Siberia. As the field intensity increases in Siberia and decreases in Canada, the north magnetic pole moves across the arctic from Canada towards Siberia2.

There is a clear correlation between the rate of change of the North Magnetic Pole location and (increase in) the global temperature. 2

The atmospheric temperatures have increased in Canadian Northern Artic lending to increased ice sheet melting and shoreline erosion6 due to contributing factors as melting of the permafrost, reduced ice cover rendering higher water temperature and increased wave caused erosion

Considerable geological and anthropological evidence supports the phenomena of Polar Shift resulting in significant global climate change occurring rapidly has been scientifically documented7

The current winter of 2009-10 evidencing unexpectedly cold temperatures8 and significant snowfall in the United Kingdom and many parts of central and southern Europe and Euro-Asia normally unacquainted with such conditions goes further to support this hypothesis. This is shown by the affects of higher temperatures in the Artic as detailed in a study titled North Atlantic Temperature Anomaly9which `postulates a high correlation between North Atlantic Temperature Anomaly and the variations of magnetic field and the Hudson Bay region… …making significant contribution to the Atlantic basin climate change.’

Conclusion: The foregoing serves only to provide correlation of well documented evidence that exists and goes to support the affects of North and South Magnetic Poles shift combined with the Sun’s solar activity on global temperatures and their resulting affects. Though this is a considerably complex and controversial subject it behooves all inhabitants of Earth to familiarize themselves with as much credible, published scientific information on the subject as to satisfy themselves to what, in their best opinion, is actually causing the obvious changes to the Globe and where it may potentially lead for all humanity.

Sources:

Source: At almost 40 miles (64 kilometers) a year due to magnetic changes in the planet’s core, new research says. A one-degree shift is equivalent to approx 66.72 mi. therefore an annual movement of 40mi is 0.5595 degrees per year. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/12/091224-north-pole-magnetic-russia-earth-core.html

2 Source: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/29may_noaaprediction.htm

3 Source: On Dec 21, 2012, which is a winter solstice (Northern Hemisphere) this centre will align with our sun once more
http://survive2012.com/index.php/galactic-alignment.html

4 Source: http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/EarthMagneticField.ht

5 Source: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/maps/SouthPole1590_2010.pdf

6 Source: http://www.physorg.com/news180039688.html
7 Source: Evidence of a Recent Pole Shift – Part 1 http://survive2012.com/index.php/pole-shift-evidence.html
8 Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/extreme-weather-in-europe-499321.html

9 Source: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/40/88/86/PDF/NATA.pdf

 

An essay espousing the conspiracy aspect of the climate change, global warming debate titled:
Climategate

Taking from the lyric of Buffalo Springfield’s song titled `For What It’s Worth’:

`There is something happening here. What it is ain’t exactly clear..

Seems a good opener to a discussion on the controversial subject of Climate Change and Global Warming that from the outset, are generally assumed to be the same thing but, a little research will clearly show they are related but, unique unto themselves.

The recent, heightened attention by Internet Blog Websites and to a lesser extent, main stream media (MSM), initially in response to the upcoming COPENHAGEN CONFERENCE dealing with these two subjects, fuel was added to the fire as result of the recent (reported 20/11/09) hacking of email from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Angliae (http://www.eastangliaemails.com/index.php). The publication of these emails has put a major `chink’ in the armor of the proponents of climate change and global warming being derived from the increased greenhouse gases namely, carbon dioxide (CO2) and, the global legislation to address this issue being discussed such as Cap and Trade (United States) Carbon Footprint Taxation (Canada, EU member states, etc).

To my interpretation of the debate centers around two fundamental school-of-thought to the cause(s) for global warming and climate change is as follows:

The pro-climate change science and supporters within international governance community, that supports from empirical study that the primary contributor is the significant increase of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), resulting from the growth of industrialization around the globe but primarily in the north-western hemisphere countries such as the United States, Western and regions of Eastern European countries exacerbated by the recent, increasing industrial development of China, India and similar developing countries. This movement does fully acknowledges the presence and affects of other influences such as solar radiation (Sun spot activity) and other naturally occurring climatic influences but deem these as secondary to the principal culprit: industry sourced carbon dioxide (CO2) emission globally.

The anti-climate change advocates point to science research that debunks the claim that CO2 is the leading contributor to the obvious changes being experienced globally. The supporters to this movement have made consorted effort to find fault with the pro-movement’s science and now with the release of email evidencing the purported manipulation of raw source climate data and the censoring, withholding and even destroying of relevant data has brought the whole pro position into question.

So where do we the general public go from here? How do we make clearer our understanding of this important and relevant issue that has and will continue to have, an affect on our quality of life.

Face it, if exceptionally funded scientist privy to all available data and resources for its collection don’t truly know what the hell is going on here, how can the common layperson be expected to know?

I obviously do not have the answer to this imperative question. All I can do is put forward factors sourced and links to available websites on the subject that may allow you, the reader to this article, to become more familiar with the facts supporting each side of the argument. To aid in some small way toward a clearer understanding in order to formulate your own opinion such that when the time comes to choose you will be better equipped to render your own, independent choice on which case should go forward.

To that end: Every attempt has been made to represent, by the linkages and references to follow, both sides of the debate as well as to introduce discussion on the other contributing factors that seem to reside on the periphery of the principle, debated factors.

References:

1. CLIMATE DEBATE DAILY (http://climatedebatedaily.com/) This is a good starting point as it presents directly the `Call To Action’ versus `Dissenting Opinion’

2. The Real News Network: Coverage of the debate leading up to COPENHAGEN CONFERENCE in Dec/09 (http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=74&jumival=481)
Coverage of Hacked Email related to Climate Change (http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4533)

3. Source of hacked emails found by date and viewable in text form (http://www.eastangliaemails.com/index.php)

NPR.org have a number of video and audio many of which are on matters affecting or effected by global warming and some discussion on what impact global warming is having on underdeveloped nations countering by the economic costs due to the restrictions imposed by climate change policy on industrial development. As stated in one of the clips featuring central Africa (paraphrasing) `You cannot mill steel or run any heavy industry on just the power from solar panels’ as would be demanded if the legislation manifests as the pro-climate change camps’ expectation. Solar and wind resourced energy be the principle source of electrical energy. A nation with an

abundance of natural energy in oil and natural gas, they are prohibited from optimizing, watch it being siphoned off to the singular benefit of the industrialized nations that represent the majority in support of climate change legislation and policy
(http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87959035&ps=rs) Be sure to scroll to the bottom of the page for `Related NPR Stories’

4. CORBETT REPORT. COM The Corbett Report provides pod cast, interviews, articles and videos about breaking news and important issues from 9/11 Truth and false flag terror to the Big Brother police state, eugenics, geopolitics, the central banking fraud and more. The `more’ being climate change and global warming (http://www.corbettreport.com/)

5. BRASSCHECK TV presenting full spectrum video and reference coverage of events of the day in all realms of daily life with a slight, bent for advocacy (http://www.brasschecktv.com/index.php?call=category&id=9z)

Well I will be adding to and updating this article from time to time. If you have anything to contribute please forward the link or information via email naykd@writing.com

To close here is the lyric `For What It’s Worth’ by BUFFALO SPRINGFIELD.

To read the lyrics in light of the climate change debate, they seem most appropriate:

ARTIST: Buffalo Springfield
TITLE: For What It’s Worth
Lyrics and Chords
There’s something happening here
What it is ain’t exactly clear
There’s a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware
I think it’s time we stop, children, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

/ E – A – / / / / E D A C /

There’s battle lines being drawn
Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong
Young people speaking their minds
Getting so much resistance from behind
I think it’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the heat
A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side
It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you’re always afraid
You step out of line, the man come and take you away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, now, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, children, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

13
Sep
14

Troubling Confluence


 

Photo by Ed Kashi

 

A recent CBC.ca interview broadcast with Naomi Klein  (Interview) wherein she discusses the background for her new book This Changes Everything, prompted the following poem:

Fragile has become the ground on which humanity treads;
A global decision to pollute and poison chosen instead,
When no longer there are resources by which it is fed
The only conclusion: humanity on Earth forever, will be dead!

Rhetorical scripts pronouncement espousing remedy
That in the end, renders no practical reversal to this calamity,
Pacified by weak measure of corporate promise to indemnity,
State governments fail to prosecute and exercise viable, criminal penalty.

For all its intelligence humanity has proven its ignorance;
For the path it has chosen with seeming indifference,
Eluded by the concept: its presence being a permanence,
Will awaken to the reality: its extinction by this troubling confluence.

 




Recent Posts

Categories


%d bloggers like this: