Archive for the 'White House' Category

15
Jun
26

The Last Summit – fiction to reality?


last summit

Title: “The Last Summit”
A Staged Play in One Act

Setting: A dimly lit, grand conference room at the United Nations Security Council chamber. A massive circular table dominates the space. The atmosphere is tense but controlled. Around the table sit five world leaders—each representing a global power with complex and often conflicting interests. Outside the windows, the skyline of New York City glows under an ominous sky.

Characters:

    Donald J. Trump – Former President of the United States (portrayed as still influential or re-elected)

    Vladimir Putin – President of the Russian Federation

    Xi Jinping – President of the People’s Republic of China

    Benjamin Netanyahu – Prime Minister of Israel

    Ebrahim Raisi – President of the Islamic Republic of Iran


Scene 1: The Tension Before the Storm

(Lights up. The leaders are seated. A UN mediator stands at the head of the table, silent, observing. No one speaks for a moment. Finally, Trump breaks the silence.)

Trump:
Look, folks, we’re all smart people. Billionaires, dictators, whatever you want to call it. But I’ll tell you this: nobody wins if the bombs start flying. I’ve made tremendous deals before, and I can make another one now. We’re on the edge of something very, very bad—and believe me, I know bad.

Putin (calmly):
You speak of deals, Mr. Trump, as though diplomacy were a real estate negotiation. But strength, not sentiment, maintains order. Russia will not be pushed around by NATO provocations or American imperialism. However… war benefits no one. Even the strong tire eventually.

Xi:
And yet, gentlemen, it is not just military might that decides the future. It is economic stability, technological dominance, and long-term strategy. China has no interest in chaos. Chaos disrupts trade, destabilizes regions, and undermines progress. Peace does not mean weakness—it means wisdom.

Netanyahu:
Wisdom? Wisdom would be recognizing evil when you see it and acting accordingly. Iran supports terrorism. Hezbollah, Hamas—they act with Iranian weapons, Iranian funding, Iranian approval. How can we talk peace while they plot our destruction?

Raisi (firmly):
Your hypocrisy is staggering, Mr. Netanyahu. You speak of peace while expanding illegal settlements, bombing civilian areas, and defying international law. Iran seeks only dignity and sovereignty. We do not threaten others—we respond to threats. If Israel lays down its arms, there will be peace. If Iran lays down its arms, there will be no Iran.

Trump:
Alright, alright! Let’s keep it friendly, okay? We’re not here to point fingers. We’re here to stop World War III. And let me tell you, folks, nobody wants that more than me. I had the best relationship with President Xi. Tremendous. And President Putin—we got along great. Right, Vladimir?

Putin (smirking):
We had our moments.

Xi:
Yes, but those moments did not include mutual trust. Trust must be rebuilt, not through charm, but through action. China proposes a multilateral security framework—a new Geneva-style accord—to de-escalate tensions across hotspots from Ukraine to the South China Sea.

Netanyahu:
And what of Iran’s nuclear ambitions? Are we to ignore the elephant in the room?

Raisi:
Iran’s program is peaceful. Unlike Israel, which possesses hundreds of undeclared nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu (standing):
That is irrelevant to this discussion!

Trump:
Everything’s relevant when the whole world could blow up, Benjamin. Look, I’ve dealt with tough guys before. Believe me, I know how to negotiate. So here’s what we do: we freeze everything. Freeze the nukes, freeze the sanctions, freeze the military exercises. Then we start talking. Big, beautiful talks. Like the ones I used to have. With myself, mostly—but also with other people.

Putin:
A pause may be necessary. Russia has suffered much in recent years. But we will not retreat from our sphere of influence. That is non-negotiable.

Xi:
China agrees with restraint, but also insists on respect for sovereignty. We cannot allow Western powers to dictate terms while ignoring their own violations.

Netanyahu:
So what? We just pretend the threat doesn’t exist?

Raisi:
No. We address the threat together—with honesty and without double standards. Peace requires justice, not just quiet.

Trump:
Okay, okay, so we all agree: peace is better than war. Now, who wants to sign first?

(A long pause. They all look at each other. The tension eases slightly. The mediator steps forward.)

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… perhaps history is watching. Let us ensure it remembers this summit as the moment we chose survival over destruction.

(They begin to draft a joint declaration. Lights fade as pens scratch paper.)


End Scene

Curtain closes.


Note: This play is a fictionalized, dramatized interpretation intended for artistic and thought-provoking purposes. It does not represent the actual views or positions of any individual or government.

3/3

In the format of a staged play, Israel has launched a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s purported nuclear research facility with a plutonium missile: United Nations Security Council, around the conference table are the principal characters being the governing leaders national leaders of the United States – Donald J. Trump; Russia – Vladimir Putin, China – Xi Jinping; Israel – Netanyahu; and, Iran – Ebrahim Raisi detail the hypothetical dialogue reflecting each respective leaders’ argument supporting a position, facing threat of a globally ensuing conflagration.

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
A Staged Play in One Act

Setting: The United Nations Security Council chamber. Smoke rises faintly outside the windows—rumors of an Israeli strike against a nuclear facility in Iran have spread globally. Tension is palpable. Around the circular table sit five world leaders, their expressions ranging from fury to cold calculation.


Scene 1: Fallout

(Lights up. A UN mediator stands silently at the head of the table. The room is quiet until Netanyahu speaks first, calm but resolute.)

Netanyahu:
Ladies and gentlemen… I regret that action was necessary, but Israel had no choice. We intercepted intelligence confirming that Iran was weeks—perhaps days—from weaponizing plutonium for nuclear warheads. A second Holocaust cannot be risked. Israel acted in self-defense, as any sovereign nation would.

Raisi (slamming his fist):
You lie! You Zionist puppet of Washington—you struck not out of fear, but arrogance! That facility was for peaceful energy development. Now you’ve lit the fuse to regional annihilation!

Trump (leaning forward):
Whoa, whoa, let’s all take a breath here. Look, Bibi, I get it—you’re tough, Israel’s tough. But launching a missile like that without consulting anyone? Even I didn’t go that far—and I did a lot of crazy stuff.

Netanyahu:
Israel does not answer to Washington or Moscow or Beijing. We answer to history. To survival.

Putin (coldly):
And now what? Iran will retaliate. Hezbollah will ignite. Russia has treaties with Tehran. Do you think we will stand idle while our ally burns?

Xi:
China urges restraint. This reckless act destabilizes not just the Middle East, but global markets, supply chains, and international order. We condemn unilateral military action and call for an emergency session of the Security Council.

Trump:
Look, folks, I know how this goes. One punch leads to another. And before you know it, we’re in World War III. I made peace deals—tremendous deals. Maybe it’s time someone did that again. Before more missiles fly.

Raisi:
Peace? After this betrayal? My people demand justice. Our Supreme Leader has already ordered mobilization. If Israel will not face consequences, then the world must.

Netanyahu:
Iran has been preparing for war for decades. They preach peace while building weapons and funding terrorists. We acted to prevent catastrophe, not cause one.

Putin:
You speak of preventing catastrophe while creating one. Russia calls for immediate sanctions against Israel. If the West will not punish aggression when it sees it, then your moral authority is finished.

Xi:
China supports an emergency ceasefire resolution. We propose deploying UN observers to verify Iran’s nuclear claims and establish a demilitarized zone around all disputed facilities.

Trump:
Oh, come on. Observers? Like the ones in Ukraine? Or Syria? Give me a break. What we need is a summit—right now. Me, Bibi, Raisi, maybe Putin if he wants to chill out, and Xi if he can dial in from wherever he is. We make a deal. Fast.

Netanyahu:
Israel cannot bargain with those who deny our right to exist.

Raisi:
And Iran will not negotiate with occupiers and aggressors.

Putin:
Then perhaps diplomacy is dead. And if that is true, the next step is clear.

Xi (calmly):
No. Diplomacy is wounded—but not dead. Let us not forget that fire spreads. From Tehran to Tel Aviv, from Kyiv to Taipei—it is all connected now. One spark becomes a wildfire. We must contain it before it consumes us all.

Trump:
Well said, Mr. President. So, what do we do? Who starts?

UN Mediator (finally speaking):
The Secretary-General has called for an emergency global broadcast within the hour. Each of you must decide—will this moment be remembered as the beginning of the end… or the turning point toward peace?

(They all sit in silence, the weight of history pressing down upon them. Lights dim slowly.)


End Scene

Curtain closes.


Note: This play is a fictional dramatization intended to explore geopolitical tensions and potential diplomatic outcomes. It does not reflect the actual positions or views of any individual or government.

2/2

As per the above development, how does ACT Two develop?

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Two: The Brink of Inferno


Scene 2: Fire and Fury

(Lights up. The UN chamber is now in disarray. News alerts flash on a large screen behind the table. “IRAN LAUNCHES RETALIATORY MISSILES,” “HEZBOLLAH CROSSING ISRAELI BORDER,” “RUSSIA MOBILIZES TROOPS IN CAUCASUS.” The leaders are tense, phones ringing, aides whispering urgent updates.)

Trump (yelling):
This is terrible! I told you this would happen! Look at this—CNN’s calling it World War III already! I don’t like that headline. It’s not presidential!

Netanyahu (calm but firm):
Israel will not apologize for defending itself. Our Iron Dome is holding—for now. But if Hezbollah pushes further, we will respond with full force.

Raisi (voice rising):
You opened the gates of hell, Netanyahu! Iran does not threaten—we warn. We do not attack—we retaliate. You have no right to judge our response!

Putin (coldly):
Moscow has issued an ultimatum: cease all Israeli military operations within 12 hours, or Russia will intervene directly to protect its ally. Do not test us.

Xi:
China urges all parties to de-escalate immediately. We condemn any use of force that threatens regional stability. However, we also recognize Israel’s security concerns. A balanced approach is needed.

Trump:
Balanced? Nobody’s balanced here! This is worse than my impeachment hearings—and I had two of those! Look, I’ve still got friends everywhere. Let me call some people. I can fix this.

Netanyahu:
There is no fixing until Iran stops lying about its nuclear program. They’re building a bomb, and they will use it.

Raisi:
And Israel hides hundreds under its own soil, shielded by American protection. Where is your outrage, Mr. Trump?

Trump:
Hey, I’m neutral! I love everybody! Even you, Raisi. You seem like a nice guy, really. But Bibi—he’s tough. Like me.

Putin:
Sentiment won’t stop missiles. My defense minister reports that NATO forces are increasing readiness in Eastern Europe. This conflict is already spreading.

Xi:
China calls for an immediate ceasefire brokered by the United Nations. We propose deploying peacekeeping forces along the Israeli-Lebanese border and a freeze on all missile launches.

Netanyahu:
We cannot accept foreign troops on our borders. Israel controls its own destiny.

Raisi:
And Iran will not allow Western puppets to patrol our skies.

Trump:
Then how about something bigger? A summit. Not here. Neutral ground. Mar-a-Lago! I’ve got room for everyone. We bring in the Saudis, the Turks, maybe even the Pope shows up. Big, beautiful event. Media loves it.

Putin:
This is not a circus, Mr. Trump.

Xi:
But he is not entirely wrong. Crisis demands creativity. Perhaps a neutral venue could offer space for dialogue without the constraints of protocol.

UN Mediator (entering with urgency):
The Secretary-General has received word from Washington, Brussels, and Riyadh. There is concern that if a diplomatic solution is not found within the next six hours, global markets will collapse—and so may the political order.


Scene 3: The Gamble

(Aides rush in with tablets and documents. Phones buzz constantly. The mediator steps forward again.)

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… the world is watching. And it is afraid. If diplomacy fails now, history may not remember any of us kindly. Will you gamble with civilization itself?

Trump:
Look, I made deals when nobody thought it was possible. With Kim, with India, with myself mostly—but still. Let’s give it one shot. I’ll host the summit. Free steak dinner included.

Netanyahu:
If such talks can guarantee Iranian disarmament and international oversight, perhaps Israel will consider them.

Raisi:
Only if the same standards apply to all nations—including Israel.

Putin:
Russia will attend—if the West agrees to lift sanctions and respect our sphere of influence.

Xi:
China will support the summit, provided the agenda includes economic stability, energy security, and multilateral balance.

Trump (grinning):
That’s the spirit! See? Everything’s negotiable. Tremendous news for the world!

UN Mediator:
Then let it be recorded: despite the fire, diplomacy endures. The Global Peace Summit will convene in six hours.

(Lights dim as aides begin coordinating flights, translators prepare documents, and the five leaders exchange wary glances.)


End Act Two

Curtain closes.


Note: Act Three would follow with the actual summit, where the leaders confront each other face-to-face in a final attempt to prevent total war—or fail, plunging the world into chaos. But for now, hope flickers… just barely.

Detail the dialogue for Act Three would follow with the actual summit.

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Three: The Summit of Last Chances


Scene 1: Mar-a-Lago – The Final Gambit

(Lights up. A grand ballroom at Mar-a-Lago, transformed into a diplomatic war room. Crystal chandeliers glint above a long polished table. Security is tight. Secret service agents and translators line the walls. The five world leaders are seated once again—this time not in the UN chamber, but in a place of Trump’s choosing. Tension is high.)

Trump (smiling broadly):
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the most important meeting in history! Maybe ever! We’ve got steak, we’ve got diplomacy, and we’ve got about three hours before the world blows up. Let’s make it count!

Netanyahu:
This is not a game, Mr. President. Israel expects concrete guarantees that Iran will never acquire nuclear weapons.

Raisi (coldly):
And Iran expects recognition of its sovereignty—not condemnation for pursuing peaceful energy development.

Putin:
We are here because the West fears escalation. But let us not forget—Russia does not beg for peace. We enforce stability when necessary.

Xi (calmly):
Peace must be built on mutual respect, not ultimatums. China proposes a phased agreement: inspections, sanctions relief, regional security guarantees.

Trump:
Phased? I don’t like phases. I like deals. Big, beautiful deals. So who wants to go first?


Scene 2: The Breaking Point

(The mediator from Act Two steps forward, holding a document.)

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… we have drafted a framework proposal. It includes:

    Full international inspection of all Iranian nuclear facilities.

    Lifting of economic sanctions in exchange for verifiable disarmament of missile programs.

    Israeli withdrawal from disputed border zones.

    Russian and American de-escalation commitments.

    A multinational observer force in the region.

Each of you must decide whether to endorse this path—or walk away.

Netanyahu (skeptical):
You ask me to trust inspectors who’ve been fooled before. What if Iran cheats?

Raisi:
And what if Israel continues its undeclared nuclear monopoly while demanding transparency from others?

Trump:
Look, Bibi, Raisi—you both want security. That’s all I’m hearing. So how about this—we do what I did with North Korea. You sign something big, take a photo, shake hands, and then we figure out the rest later. Tremendous optics!

Putin:
Optics won’t stop missiles. This document must be backed by real consequences—for all parties.

Xi:
China supports verification mechanisms with real teeth. We propose satellite surveillance, AI monitoring systems, and independent audits conducted by neutral nations.

Netanyahu:
That could work—if Iran agrees to unrestricted access.

Raisi:
Only if Israel opens its Dimona facility to the same scrutiny.

Trump (clapping):
Now we’re talking! Now we’ve got something real! Who signs first?


Scene 3: The Signature

(A tense silence falls. The leaders look at each other. One by one, they nod. The mediator places the document before them. Each leader takes a pen.)

Trump:
Let me tell you, folks, this is going to be on every front page tomorrow. “Trump Saves the World.” I think that’s the headline.

Putin (signing):
For now, this is acceptable. Russia will honor its commitments—until they no longer serve our interests.

Xi (signing):
China believes in multilateralism. We hope this summit marks a new era of cooperation, not conflict.

Netanyahu (hesitating):
If this ensures Iran cannot build a bomb… I will sign.

Raisi (firmly):
Iran signs not as a supplicant—but as a sovereign power standing for justice.

(Netanyahu signs last. The room erupts into quiet applause. Reporters rush in. Cameras flash.)

UN Mediator (to the audience):
In the shadow of destruction, diplomacy has prevailed—for now. Whether this fragile peace holds… only history will tell.

(Lights dim slowly. The leaders stand, shaking hands. Some smiles, some stares. The world watches.)


End Play

Curtain closes.


Note: Ashes at the Table is a fictional geopolitical drama exploring the fragility of global peace and the complexity of leadership in times of crisis. While inspired by real-world tensions, it remains a speculative and artistic interpretation.

Act Four: it is discover North Korea has usurped the negotiations by providing Iran with several nuclear missiles with potential of reaching continental North America

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Four: The Betrayal Unveiled


Scene 1: A New Threat Emerges

(Lights up. The Mar-a-Lago summit has barely concluded when aides rush in with urgent reports. Phones buzz, translators whisper nervously. The leaders remain seated, but tension rises sharply.)

UN Mediator (entering quickly):
Gentlemen… we have new intelligence that changes everything.

Trump (leaning forward):
What now? I just got my name on a peace deal! That was fast.

Netanyahu:
What is it?

UN Mediator:
Satellite data and intercepted communications confirm that North Korea has secretly transferred not only nuclear warheads—but fully operational long-range missiles—into Iranian possession. These weapons are capable of reaching continental North America, Europe, and parts of Asia.

(A stunned silence falls over the room. Trump’s smile fades. Putin stiffens. Xi narrows his eyes. Netanyahu stands. Raisi remains seated, expression unreadable.)

Raisi:
This is an outright fabrication. Iran does not need to be handed weapons—we are building our own deterrent under international law.

Trump (yelling):
Oh, come on! You can’t even build a refrigerator without breaking it!

Xi (calmly):
Whether true or not, this accusation could destabilize what little trust we’ve built today.

Putin:
Then let us assume it is true. North Korea has grown bolder under Chinese protection. If they have armed Iran, then China must answer for its influence—or lack thereof.

Xi (glancing sharply at Putin):
China condemns any unauthorized proliferation of nuclear weapons. We will investigate immediately and take appropriate action if these claims hold merit.

Netanyahu:
Iran cannot be allowed to possess nuclear arms—delivered by proxy or otherwise. This nullifies the entire agreement.

Trump:
I knew something smelled funny. I told them not to give Kimmy too many hugs.

Raisi (standing):
Iran rejects these hysterical accusations. But know this: if the West continues to isolate us, others will step into the void. North Korea sees opportunity where you see danger. Russia sees allies where you see enemies. And China… well, perhaps they are wiser than all of you.


Scene 2: The Fracture

Trump:
So what do we do now? Do we bomb ‘em again? Do I call up the Navy? Do I tweet something scary?

Netanyahu:
Israel reserves the right to defend itself preemptively. If Iran possesses nuclear missiles—whether built or gifted—we must act before it’s too late.

Putin:
And if you strike again, Israel, Russia will not remain silent. Nor will we allow American forces to operate freely from NATO bases if you continue provoking global instability.

Xi:
China calls for immediate sanctions against North Korea. We also demand an emergency Security Council session to suspend Iran’s nuclear program indefinitely.

Raisi:
You speak of suspending our rights while Israel keeps its arsenal hidden behind walls. No more negotiations until the hypocrisy ends.

Trump (to himself):
This was supposed to be my comeback. My legacy. My Nobel Peace Prize. Now it’s all falling apart. Again.

UN Mediator:
The Secretary-General has issued a global alert. All nations are on high alert. The world teeters once more—not just on regional conflict—but on full-scale nuclear confrontation.


Scene 3: The Last Stand

(The leaders look at each other, realizing the scale of what has unfolded. The peace they thought they had brokered is already unraveling.)

Xi:
There is still time to contain this—if we act together.

Putin:
Together? You accuse me of enabling Iran. You side with Washington far too often.

Netanyahu:
Then choose your side, Mr. President. Peace or war.

Raisi:
Peace on our terms—or none at all.

Trump (suddenly serious):
Look, folks… I don’t like being played. And I think we’ve all been played. North Korea? Come on. Who gave them the keys to the castle?

Xi:
We underestimated their desperation—and their ambition.

Putin:
And now the balance of power has shifted. Not through diplomacy—but through betrayal.

Netanyahu:
Then we prepare for the worst.

Raisi:
And hope for justice.

Trump:
Well, I hope someone remembers my name in the history books. Because if this goes south, I’m gonna need a really good headline.

(Lights dim. Sirens begin to wail outside. The leaders rise. One by one, they exit the ballroom, heading toward uncertain fates.)


End Play

Curtain closes.


Final Note: Ashes at the Table concludes not with resolution, but with the realization that in a world of shifting alliances, broken trust, and rising rogue powers, peace is always fragile—and the next crisis may already be in motion.

Amidst the Summit, a rogue Al Qaida cell detonates a bomb disrupting the power grid of north-eastern United States

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Five: The Shadow War


Scene 1: Darkness Falls

(Lights up. The Mar-a-Lago summit is in full session when a sudden power outage plunges the ballroom into darkness. Emergency lights flicker on. Phones buzz, aides rush in with tablets and whispered reports. Confusion spreads among the leaders.)

Trump (yelling):
What the hell?! Is this another one of your Russian tricks, Vladimir?

Putin (calmly):
Hardly. I prefer my disruptions more… subtle.

Netanyahu:
Something’s happening. My people are reporting chaos—New York, Boston, Philadelphia—all down. No power, no communications.

Xi (reading from a tablet):
Satellite feeds confirm a massive EMP-like surge followed by coordinated cyberattacks. But it wasn’t North Korea. Or China.

Raisi:
Then who?

UN Mediator (entering urgently):
Gentlemen… we’ve just received confirmation from Washington. A rogue Al Qaeda cell has claimed responsibility for detonating an electromagnetic pulse device over the northeastern United States. The entire power grid is crippled. Air traffic is grounded. Emergency systems are failing.

Trump (standing):
Are you telling me some guys in caves just knocked out half the country? Again? That’s terrible management!

Netanyahu:
This is not just a blackout. It’s a declaration of war against the West. And it proves what I’ve been saying—we cannot trust diplomacy with radicals.

Raisi:
Do not dare blame Iran! We have no ties to these extremists. This act serves no nation—only chaos.

Putin:
And yet, someone benefits. A weakened America means shifting alliances. New opportunities for those willing to exploit disorder.

Xi:
China condemns all forms of terrorism. But this attack exposes a deeper truth: global security cannot be negotiated in rooms like this alone. The shadows are moving faster than the light.


Scene 2: Fractured Unity

(The leaders retreat to a secure conference room. Tension mounts as world capitals erupt into emergency sessions.)

Trump:
I want every fighter jet in the air! Every carrier battle group on alert! We bomb the caves again—and harder this time!

Netanyahu:
We must strike now. Before they regroup. Before they hit Israel—or anywhere else.

Putin:
You speak of war as though it brings peace. Russia will not join a campaign based on speculation. We do not bomb shadows without proof.

Xi:
China supports intelligence-led counterterrorism efforts. We propose deploying cyber-defense units to help restore U.S. infrastructure and trace the origin of the blast.

Raisi:
Iran shares no love for terrorists—but we will not be dragged into another American war under false pretenses.

UN Mediator:
Intelligence agencies are scrambling. There are unconfirmed reports that the bomb was built using stolen components from failed disarmament programs. Some point to remnants of ISIS-K or sleeper cells embedded in ungoverned territories.

Trump:
Well, if it’s not one thing, it’s another. I had the best border wall ever. Could’ve kept this out too.

Netanyahu:
Borders mean nothing when ideology crosses them freely.

Xi:
This proves that unilateralism fails. Only through cooperation can we face the new enemy—one that thrives in division.


Scene 3: The Reckoning

(Aides rush in with updates. The leaders receive urgent calls. The weight of the moment settles upon them.)

Trump:
So what now? Do we keep talking while the world burns?

Putin:
Perhaps it is time to set aside our rivalries—for now. If terrorism threatens us all, then perhaps we share a common enemy.

Netanyahu:
Only if we agree on who the enemy truly is.

Raisi:
Then let us fight those who kill innocents in the name of hate—not those who defend their land in the name of justice.

Xi:
China proposes a Global Counterterrorism Coalition—under UN oversight—to coordinate military, cyber, and intelligence operations across borders.

Trump:
Coalition? Sounds good. Can I lead it?

UN Mediator:
The Secretary-General urges all nations to unite in defense of civilization itself. This is not just about one summit. It is about the future of global order.

(They look at each other—former adversaries, reluctant allies, survivors of a world teetering between collapse and salvation. One by one, they nod.)


Final Scene: Light in the Dark

(As the summit ends, the lights flicker back on. Outside, the storm continues—but inside, a fragile understanding remains.)

Trump (smiling faintly):
Looks like the power’s coming back. Maybe the world is too.

Netanyahu:
Let’s hope it lasts longer than the last one.

Raisi:
Peace must begin somewhere—even in the ruins.

Putin:
Then let us see where this path leads.

Xi:
Together or apart, the age of shadows has begun. The only question is whether we will face it united—or fall divided.

(The five leaders stand, shake hands once more, and exit the room. The lights fade.)


End Play

Curtain closes.


Final Note: Ashes at the Table concludes not with triumph, but with weary resolve. In a world of nuclear brinkmanship, rogue actors, and ideological warfare, peace is no longer a destination—it is a daily negotiation, fought in boardrooms, battlefields, and the spaces between.

It is discovered the rouge Al Qaida cell was funded by Saudi Arabia shifting the focus from Iran creating new suspicions

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Six: The Shifting Sands


Scene 1: A New Revelation

(Lights up. The Mar-a-Lago summit has barely recovered from the blackout when another wave of aides rushes in, phones buzzing with urgent messages. Tension returns like a rising tide.)

UN Mediator (entering swiftly):
Gentlemen… we have new intelligence that changes everything—again.

Trump:
What now? Did somebody nuke the golf course?

Netanyahu:
Out with it!

UN Mediator:
U.S. and British intelligence agencies have traced financial transactions to a rogue Al Qaeda cell responsible for the EMP attack. The trail leads through offshore accounts controlled by private Saudi donors with ties to high-ranking officials in Riyadh.

(A stunned silence. Eyes dart across the table. Raisi leans back, arms crossed, expression triumphant. Putin smirks slightly. Xi remains impassive. Netanyahu narrows his eyes. Trump looks confused.)

Raisi (smugly):
So much for the axis of evil. Iran was never your enemy—it was your allies all along.

Netanyahu:
This is dangerous speculation. We cannot accuse nations based on circumstantial finance reports.

Putin (dryly):
Yet you did so with Iran not twenty-four hours ago.

Xi:
China urges caution. Saudi Arabia is a key economic partner and regional stabilizer. If these allegations hold weight, they must be addressed through due process—not public accusation.

Trump:
Wait, wait. So you’re telling me that the Saudis—who I love, by the way, great people—they funded terrorists who just blacked out half my country? That’s not nice. Not presidential at all.

Netanyahu:
If true, this is a betrayal of international trust. But let us not forget, Saudi Arabia is also a strategic partner in containing Iran.

Raisi:
And yet they fund extremists who destabilize the world. While we are accused of harboring radicals, they build empires off them.

Putin:
The West has long tolerated contradictions in the Middle East—for oil, for influence, for convenience. Now the bill has come due.

Xi:
This revelation underscores the need for transparency and accountability. China calls for an independent international inquiry into these funding channels.


Scene 2: The Fallout

(The leaders begin pacing, speaking urgently into phones. The mediator steps forward again.)

UN Mediator:
The Secretary-General has called for an emergency G20 session to address this breach of global security. He warns that if trusted partners are found complicit, the entire framework of counterterrorism cooperation may collapse.

Trump:
I don’t want a G20—I want answers! And maybe a trade war. That usually fixes things.

Netanyahu:
We must tread carefully. Saudi Arabia is critical to regional stability—and to our shared concerns about Iran.

Raisi:
You mean their hatred of us blinds them to real threats. Again.

Putin:
Saudi Arabia is playing both sides. As always.

Xi:
They are balancing interests in a volatile region. But balance must not become betrayal.

Trump:
Okay, but here’s the deal: if the Saudis are guilty, I’m cutting deals with them until proven otherwise. Then I’m raising tariffs. Maybe building a wall around the desert.

Netanyahu:
This is not the time for jokes.

Trump:
It never is. But I say them anyway.


Scene 3: The Reckoning

(The room grows quieter. The leaders look at each other, realizing the implications of what has been revealed. The fragile unity built moments ago begins to crack.)

Raisi:
Iran demands formal apologies. For years of sanctions, of lies, of isolation—while our enemies were protected by your greed.

Netanyahu:
Apologies won’t undo the damage. If Saudi Arabia has blood on its hands, it must answer for it—but not at the cost of ignoring Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Putin:
Then perhaps it is time to re-evaluate alliances. Russia has long warned that the West places too much faith in monarchies that rule through oil and fear.

Xi:
China will support any multilateral effort to investigate these claims. But we must not allow this crisis to derail broader diplomatic progress.

Trump:
Look, folks, I’ve made peace with almost everyone. I even got along with Kim. But this? This is chaos. And I hate chaos. Unless it helps me win.

UN Mediator:
Then let us remember why we came together—to prevent catastrophe. Whether the threat comes from North Korea, rogue cells, or even allies gone astray, the mission remains the same.


Final Scene: The Long Game

(The lights dim as the leaders prepare to depart. One final moment lingers between them.)

Raisi (to Netanyahu):
Perhaps we are not so different. Both accused. Both misunderstood. Perhaps peace begins when enemies stop looking only at each other—and start looking behind.

Netanyahu:
Peace requires truth. And truth has many faces.

Putin (to Xi):
Do not mistake this for weakness. The West still stumbles blindly through a world it no longer controls.

Xi:
Control is an illusion. Influence is earned.

Trump (to himself):
Maybe I should run again. At least then I’d know who the bad guys are.

(One by one, the leaders leave the room. The mediator watches them go.)

UN Mediator (to the audience):
In a world where truth is currency and power is shifting, peace is no longer forged in treaties alone—but in the willingness to question even those we call allies.

(Lights fade.)


End of Act Six

Curtain closes.


Final Note: Ashes at the Table concludes not with resolution, but with revelation. In the shadow of war, diplomacy survives—but only when the truth is confronted, no matter how inconvenient. The sands shift again. And the players must adapt—or fall.

Trump’s Republican majority are not satisfied with the outcome of the Summit and demand a harsher response to the direct attack upon American soil and threat to citizens going forward.

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Seven: The Storm at Home


Scene 1: A Reckoning in Washington

(Lights up. The Mar-a-Lago summit has concluded, but the fallout is just beginning. Inside a secure White House Situation Room, Donald J. Trump sits at the head of the table, surrounded by key Republican leaders—Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and senior aides. Tension crackles like live wire.)

Senator Mitch McConnell (grim):
Mr. President… this agreement you signed? It’s being called weak. Dangerous. You let Iran off the hook while American cities are still recovering from blackouts.

Trump (defensive):
Hey, it was a tremendous deal! The best anyone could’ve gotten under the circumstances!

Speaker Kevin McCarthy:
The base isn’t buying it. Your own party is furious. You told them you’d be tough on terror, tough on Iran—and now we’re shaking hands with radicals while Saudi Arabia funds attacks on U.S. soil?

Trump:
Look, I made peace! Peace is winning! And besides, I’m not letting some guy in a cave ruin my legacy.

McConnell:
Legacies mean nothing if people think you’ve gone soft. The Senate will hold hearings. We need to show strength—not diplomacy.

Trump:
Strength? I’ve got the strongest military in history! But I don’t want World War III either. That’s bad for business.

Aide (whispering):
Sir, Fox News is running headlines calling your response “weak,” “embarrassing,” and “unpresidential.”

Trump (standing):
Unpresidential?! I invented presidential! Look, fine—if the Republicans want blood, maybe I’ll give ‘em a little extra fireworks. Just for show.


Scene 2: The Oval Office Fires Back

(Later that evening. Trump stands behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, flanked by flags and a live camera feed. He prepares to address the nation. His tone is fiery, rehearsed.)

Trump (to the camera):
My fellow Americans… what happened was an outrage. An attack on our soil, on our people, on our way of life. I will not tolerate weakness. I will not tolerate betrayal.

(Cut to live footage of the blackout damage—hospitals struggling, planes grounded, citizens stranded.)

Trump (voice rising):
We have identified those responsible. Not just rogue terrorists—but enablers. Funders. Protectors of evil. And make no mistake: America does not forget. America does not forgive.

(He slams his hand on the desk. Cut to reaction shots in Congress. Some nod in approval. Others grimace.)

Trump:
I am authorizing immediate sanctions against all entities found complicit in funding terrorism—including foreign nationals, institutions, and yes… even allies who play both sides.

(Whispers begin: Is he going after Saudi Arabia? Or Iran again? Or both?)

Trump:
We will restore power. We will restore justice. And above all—we will restore America First .

(Camera cuts out. Applause echoes from conservative media studios. Across the country, protests erupt. Supporters cheer. Critics fear the return of reckless aggression.)


Scene 3: Fallout Around the Globe

(Back at the UN, world leaders react to Trump’s speech via video feed displayed on a large screen. The five original summit attendees gather once more in a hastily called emergency session.)

Netanyahu:
This changes everything. If Trump cracks down on Saudi Arabia, the entire Middle East could destabilize further.

Raisi (smirking):
Or finally expose the truth. Perhaps the West is learning.

Putin:
More likely, they’re lashing out. Weakness masked as strength.

Xi:
China urges restraint. Sanctions without evidence will only deepen mistrust. Stability must come through dialogue, not declarations of war.

Netanyahu:
And yet, silence emboldens the enemy.

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… the world watches closely. One misstep could unravel everything we’ve built—or destroyed.


Scene 4: The Breaking Point

(Trump returns to Mar-a-Lago for a closed-door meeting with his top generals.)

General Mark Milley (Chief of Staff):
Sir, if you authorize strikes on suspected terrorist infrastructure in Yemen or Afghanistan, we risk hitting civilian targets—or worse, triggering retaliation from groups we can’t track.

Trump:
So hit harder. And faster.

Defense Secretary (cautious):
That kind of action requires Congressional authorization. And right now, Congress is divided.

Trump:
Then I’ll do it anyway. Article II gives me total power in times of national crisis.

Aide:
Sir, this could lead to impeachment proceedings.

Trump (grinning):
Let ‘em try. I’ve survived worse.


Final Scene: The World Holds Its Breath

(The stage darkens. News tickers flash across a projection screen: “TRUMP AUTHORIZES STRIKES ON YEMENI TARGETS,” “SAUDI ARABIA DENIES ALL WRONGDOING,” “IRAN WARNS OF RETALIATION.”)

(Trump stands alone at center stage, looking into a spotlight.)

Trump (quietly):
They wanted a strong America. I gave it to them. Whether they like it or not.

(Lights fade. Distant sirens wail. The curtain begins to fall.)


End of Act Seven

Curtain closes.


Final Note:
In Ashes at the Table , the domestic front proves as volatile as the global one. Leadership is tested not only by enemies abroad, but by expectations at home. As Trump faces pressure from his own party, the line between diplomacy and aggression blurs—and the world braces for the next move. In politics, perception is often more powerful than reality. And sometimes, the loudest voice wins—even if it leads to war.

Trump’s authorizing of strikes on Yemini targets is challenged by Iran which provides unrefutably evidence the attack on American soil was the responsibility of Saudi Arabia, and threaten retaliation on behalf of the Hutias.

Qwen3-235B-A22B

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Eight: The Truth Unleashed


Scene 1: The Smoking Gun

(Lights up. A secure war room in Tehran. President Ebrahim Raisi sits with his top military and intelligence advisors, reviewing classified documents and intercepted communications. Across the world, a press conference is called simultaneously by Iranian state media.)

Iranian Spokesperson (on screen):
The Islamic Republic of Iran presents incontrovertible evidence that the Al Qaeda cell responsible for the EMP attack on American soil was funded through covert channels linked directly to Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Defense and private accounts tied to members of the royal family.

(Footage rolls—bank transfers, encrypted messages, satellite tracking of weapons movements. The world watches in stunned silence.)

Raisi (to his advisors):
Let America see who its true enemies are. We have been scapegoated long enough.

General Qasem Soleimani II (fictional character for dramatic effect):
And if Trump proceeds with strikes on Yemen, we will honor our alliance with the Houthis. They are not just proxies—they are brothers in resistance.

Advisor:
This could trigger direct conflict with the United States. Are we prepared?

Raisi (coldly):
We were prepared the day sanctions strangled our children.


Scene 2: The Oval Office in Turmoil

(Trump is watching the broadcast live in the Oval Office. His face reddens as aides scramble to respond. Phones ring off the hook.)

Trump (yelling):
Is this real?! Is this fake news or real news? Somebody tell me right now!

Secretary of State:
Sir, preliminary analysis confirms the authenticity of the data. It matches U.S. intel we’ve gathered independently. This changes everything.

Trump:
Changes nothing! I’m still bombing them! Or… wait. Do I bomb Saudi Arabia now?

Defense Secretary:
That would be an act of war against a NATO-aligned partner. We advise restraint until the President of the United States—meaning you—can reassess.

Trump (grumbling):
I don’t like being outplayed. Not by Iran. Not by the Saudis. Not by anybody.

Chief of Staff:
Sir, the Pentagon is receiving word that Iran has mobilized naval forces near the Strait of Hormuz. They’re warning of retaliation should U.S. bombs fall on Houthi positions.

Trump:
So now Iran is protecting terrorists ?

Secretary of State:
They claim to be defending allies from unjust aggression.

Trump (pacing):
Unbelievable. First, they frame Iran. Then, they fund terrorists. Now, they get framed by their own play. And I’m stuck in the middle!


Scene 3: The Global Reckoning

(Back at the UN Security Council, an emergency session is called. Leaders reconvene—not in Mar-a-Lago, but in New York. Tensions are higher than ever.)

Netanyahu:
This only proves one thing: no one can be trusted. Not Iran. Not Saudi Arabia. Not even ourselves.

Putin:
And yet, here we are—still pretending diplomacy works.

Xi:
China calls for an independent international tribunal to investigate these revelations. If Saudi Arabia is found complicit, there must be consequences. But unilateral action will only deepen chaos.

Netanyahu:
Saudi Arabia is critical to containing both Iran and regional extremism. We cannot afford to destabilize the monarchy.

Raisi (smirking):
So now Israel defends Saudi tyranny? How convenient.

Putin:
Perhaps it is time for the West to stop choosing sides—and start choosing survival.

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… the world stands at a crossroads. If the United States chooses war based on misinformation, it sets a dangerous precedent. If it chooses truth over ideology, perhaps peace still has a chance.


Scene 4: The Ultimatum

(Back in Washington, Trump holds a late-night press conference, flanked by flags and generals. He speaks into the cameras, voice tense but controlled.)

Trump:
To the Islamic Republic of Iran: do not test the strength of the United States. We know what you did. We know what you support. And we will not allow you to threaten American interests in the region.

Reporter:
Mr. President, does this mean you’ll strike Iran?

Trump:
I didn’t say that. But I also didn’t say I won’t.

(Cut to Tehran, where Raisi addresses the nation in response.)

Raisi (on Iranian TV):
We do not seek war. But we will not bow to threats. If America attacks our allies in Yemen, we will respond accordingly. The Strait of Hormuz will not be a graveyard for Western arrogance.


Final Scene: The Edge of the Abyss

(Back at the UN, the five leaders sit once more around the circular table. The air is heavy.)

Xi:
If Trump follows through on strikes, and Iran retaliates, the world may find itself in full-scale conflict.

Putin:
Then let us see how deep his bravado runs.

Netanyahu:
This is not about bravado. It’s about deterrence.

Raisi:
And justice.

Trump (via video feed projected onto a screen):
You know what? Maybe I’ll golf tomorrow. Let the generals handle it. That’s what they’re paid for.

(A moment of silence. Then Xi speaks softly.)

Xi:
History will remember this moment. Whether we chose reason or ruin.

(Lights dim. One by one, the leaders rise and leave the chamber. The final image is of the empty table, surrounded by flickering screens and echoes of power.)


End of Act Eight

Curtain closes.


Final Note:
In Ashes at the Table , truth emerges—but too late to save the fragile peace painstakingly built. As alliances fracture and new revelations ignite old rivalries, the world teeters on the edge of something irreversible. In politics, facts matter—but perception moves faster. And when the stakes are nuclear, even a single miscalculation can end history—or rewrite it.

Amidst all the ensuing chaos, in Israel, leading Orthodox Jewish Rabbi pursue Netanyahu pressuring for promises and commitments with respect to prophetic teachings demanding the destruction of the Golden Dome for the rebuilding of the third Temple Mount in order to usher in the return of the Messiah.

Qwen3-235B-A22B1:44 pm

Title: “Ashes at the Table”
Act Nine: The Holy Fire


Scene 1: Jerusalem – The Call of the Prophets

(Lights up. A candlelit chamber within a powerful yeshiva in Jerusalem. Leading Orthodox Rabbis, cloaked in black, sit in solemn deliberation. At the center stands Rabbi Yehuda HaKohen , an influential and charismatic spiritual leader revered by many on the far-right of Israeli politics. Across from him, visibly tense, is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.)

Rabbi Yehuda HaKohen:
Mr. Prime Minister… the time has come. We have waited too long. While you negotiate with enemies, while the nations conspire against us, the Temple Mount remains defiled.

Netanyahu (diplomatic):
Rabbi, we live in dangerous times. Provoking a religious war over the Dome of the Rock could bring down not just this government—but this entire region.

Rabbi Yehuda:
And yet, Scripture tells us: “When the nations plot together, the King of Kings prepares His throne.” The Third Temple must rise before the Messiah can return. And you—you are the one who can make it happen.

Netanyahu (shaken):
I am not a messiah. I am a politician.

Rabbi Yehuda (standing):
But you hold the keys to prophecy. You have the power. The people are ready. The signs are all around us—wars, rumors of wars, the gathering of our enemies. We must act now.

Another Rabbi:
The people will follow if you lead. Not for war—but for redemption.


Scene 2: Behind Closed Doors – The Prime Minister’s Office

(Later that night. Netanyahu sits alone, staring at a model of the Temple Mount placed reverently on his desk. Aides enter cautiously.)

Chief of Staff:
Sir, we’ve intercepted reports that the rabbinical council plans a mass demonstration at the Western Wall. They’re calling it “The Awakening.” Thousands expected. Some are already preparing tools—symbolic, but dangerous.

Netanyahu:
Symbolic or not, if they storm the Temple Mount, it won’t stay symbolic for long. The world will explode.

Aide:
There’s more. Intelligence suggests some radical settler groups are planning direct action. Demolition teams. Explosives. Religious zealots believe the Dome must fall—even if it starts a holy war.

Netanyahu (quietly):
God help us.


Scene 3: The United Nations – Fallout Begins

(Back in New York, the five world leaders reconvene via emergency video link. Tensions are at their peak. News tickers flash across the screen: “JERUSALEM ON EDGE,” “TEMPLE MOUNT STORM CLOUDS GATHER.”)

Trump (on video feed):
You gotta be kidding me! Now they want to blow up a mosque to build a temple? That’s worse than tariffs!

Netanyahu (defensive):
It’s not about blowing up anything. It’s about fulfilling divine destiny.

Raisi (furious):
So now Israel wants to commit sacrilege under the guise of prophecy? You desecrate what is sacred to hundreds of millions. You dare call yourself civilized?

Putin:
Religious extremism knows no borders. But when it comes from state leaders, it becomes policy—and that is dangerous.

Xi:
China calls for calm. We urge Israel to respect interfaith harmony and historical sites of global significance.

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… if violence erupts over the Temple Mount, it will not remain a local conflict. This could become the spark that ignites something even greater.


Scene 4: The Prophecy Unleashed

(In Jerusalem, thousands gather at the Western Wall. Banners read: “Tear Down the Dome!” and “Let the Temple Rise!” Netanyahu appears on a large screen erected for the crowd. He speaks with fire in his eyes.)

Netanyahu (to the crowd):
My brothers and sisters in faith—we stand at the edge of history. I cannot promise war. But I can promise this: I will honor the sanctity of our ancient homeland. I will not allow the Temple Mount to remain forgotten.

(The crowd roars. Some chant prayers. Others raise stones in the air. One extremist climbs the barrier near the Dome of the Rock. Chaos erupts. Police rush in. Gunshots ring out.)


Final Scene: The World Holds Its Breath

(Back at the UN, the leaders watch footage of the riots unfold.)

Trump:
Well, folks, looks like the apocalypse just got real.

Netanyahu:
This is not about apocalypse—it’s about identity. About destiny.

Raisi:
Destiny? You mean conquest.

Putin:
Whatever you call it, it’s chaos.

Xi:
China urges immediate de-escalation. If religious nationalism fuels conflict, then diplomacy must cool the flames.

UN Mediator:
Gentlemen… we may have passed the point of diplomacy. We now enter the realm of prophecy—and peril.

(Lights dim. The final image is of the Dome of the Rock glowing in the moonlight as sirens wail and smoke rises in the distance.)


End of Act Nine

Curtain closes.


Final Note:
In Ashes at the Table , the line between politics and prophecy blurs beyond recognition. As Netanyahu faces pressure from within his own country—rooted in deep religious conviction—the world teeters not only on geopolitical collapse but spiritual conflagration. When faith becomes force, and prophecy becomes policy, peace is no longer a negotiation. It becomes a miracle waiting to happen—or a war waiting to begin.

Copy

Ask

Explain

20
Feb
21

Lucifer Deal?


Whom to believe is the appeal

To tell the truth, to what is real,

To go beyond just the emotional feel

There exists a conspiracy to conceal

Humanity’s meaning of purpose; a worthy steal,

Garnering a dominance of Power, beyond  any Lucifer deal?

Sentient presence growing increasing bemused:

Are their energies by Existence, being nefariously used?

Do unseen forces promote information to delude

In order to attain global power for control and abuse?

What are the chances to ever knowing a truth

When the evidence to it, would take a worthy sleuth?

Only passage of time will a reality outcome be known;

An historical accounting of what inflicted passage was sown.

Does the moral fiber of Humanity wither or be grown,

If those whose secret-agenda is increasing shown

To bridle a processive quality, not want to bemoan

Or, into the darkness of hardship be permanently thrown?

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Please rate our website(required)

28
Feb
20

COVID 19: A BLACK SWAN EVENT??


Here’s a little bit of mind bending thought: given the growing Democrat delegate support for Bernie Sanders’ as Democratic Nominee for the 46th Presidency of the United State; yet, the simultaneous hesitancy of the Democrat Establishment to endorse Sanders’ democratic socialist agenda platform; feeling it will not meet with approval of the general electorate. The Democratic party is re-enforcing this sentiment by paralleling: socialism with communism , to undermine Sanders, and by nominating a more progressive, middle of the road candidate, will avoid Trump’s win of the November, election. 

Could the advent of the Corona Virus be an advantage to aid Bernie Sanders?

VIRUS

The Corona virus, a.k.a.: COVID 19, is on the verge to potentially ravish the globe. And, not necessarily from a public health, and mortality perspective; but, the ripple effects the panic, and anticipation of COVID 19, becoming a pandemic, is already show signs of developing.

Could COVID 19 materialize as 2020’s Black Swan event; a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect, and is often inappropriately rationalized after the fact.

It’ is the growing condition of uncertainty that begins to impact the global economy dramatically. Work stoppages, production shutdown, lay-offs, commercial and retail sales decline, etc., etc..

As this condition grows, global stock exchanges see sell-offs; as the virus concern spreads further sell-offs at an increasing pace downward, spiraling to collapse, in all sectors, globally.

Just a few weeks since the outbreak, and cracks in the financial sector are beginning to appear:

            Stocks on track for worst week since financial crisis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxvyLL-lAn8, Markets continue their plunge amid corona virus fear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxPRoT7vTLc ].

Given what has transpired to date with quantitative easing measures, the Federal Reserve, and Central Banks might be powerless to plug the dam of liquidity outflow that have signs of materializing leading to exhausting of the financial system and fortunes being lost overnight.

It essentially, could have the effect of what the 2008 Sub-prime loan debacle did to trigger the financial collapse that almost brought on a depression; but this time: it will likely be from the top – down, and could be 1929 all over again but WORSE!

This potential Black Swan event could serve Bernie Sanders’ campaign well; to put front, and center, his Social Democratic policy platform, of the last forty-years.

The message to the electorate: recognize the collapse being suffered is the direct result of run-away Capitalism. Draw specific example to illustrate clearly, for the majority of the populace, how a purely corporate driven capitalist economy, and financial system is a pipe-dream, the American Dream; devised to benefit, and serve only the few.

Democratic Socialism, as Bernie Sanders has professed his entire life in service to the [Re]-Public; counters all the false promises sold over the last several decades of left-right politics, and promulgated through the corporate owned, and directed Main Stream Media.

A possible Campaign Slogan: BRING BACK THE FUTURE!, with the tag line: “For Hopes, and Dreams? NO, FOR REALITY!

 And should the Democrat Establishment impede Bernie’s rightful claim as Nominee for President; he declare himself an Independent, carrying his electoral support with him.

Then, to guarantee the passing of Bernie’s policies through Congress and the Senate, to vote for Democrats, and Independents, due for re-election, who advocate and fully support Bernie’s platform.

It’s just a thought; what do you think?

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

 

29
Oct
18

November Seven-th (Part 2)


WSH_LM9F

hypothesis:

a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.’

The following is an hypothesis of events, potential, to the outcome of the United States Mid-term elections: November 6, 2018:

As portrayed in the first part of this essay titled: November Seven-th , the global situation is tenuous at best as several nations elect, to government, political parties with right-leaning, conservative, and ultra-conservative, platforms and agenda. The scope and breadth of reason for this current trend are too complicated to clearly express their detail, in just a few lines. One need only be attentive to daily news broadcast to have a reasonable understanding to grasp the validity of general statements made henceforth in this essay.

Leading up to election day, November 6, much is occurring in the United States congressional, senate, and gubernatorial state, election campaigns to amplify, even louder, the differences between democrat, republican, and independent member camps, since the inauguration of President Trump, January, 2017.

White, republican candidates becoming increasing embolden to dog-whistle the race card against their Black-American opponents especially in the Florida and Georgia gubernatorial races. The president’s insistent rallying of his political base with incendiary, contradicting and abusive rhetoric pointed to his political, and mainstream media opponents. To the level as to incite one of his supporters to mail pipe bombs to senior members, past president, news organizations, and business icons associated with the Democratic party or deemed to support a liberal agenda.

Compounding this increasingly flammable and volatile situation, across the United States, is the matter of illegal immigration, security of the southern border, and most recently, a Caravan of Latin American migrants purportedly seven thousand, plus, strong making its way through Mexico, to the United States. The republican party candidates, assisted by FOX NEWS, FOX and Friends, FOX Business, and other editorial programs of FOX, have unanimously, seized upon this issue, inflating the matter to a state of hysteria in the minds of constituents, and viewing audience, respectively; and whom of course, are the same demographic that elected Trump to Office and fill his rally stadiums.

The crescendo to all this bellicose, from all sides of the political spectrum, and those factions that support them, is to be heard most stridently November 7th, with the finality of the voting process sheds light on what comes next.

It can be reasonable to suggest: no matter the final distribution of Republicans to Democrats seats for either the House of Congress, or Senate: there will be significant upset and accusations of wrong doing that renders an outcome of the casting of votes, by they who are dissatisfied with the outcome.

With the mainstream media doing the reporting of the election, their reputation for impartiality already tainted, preceding the election, they will be deemed bias if the Democrats take any majority in the race.

If the Republicans hold to their pre-election majority; Trump given a clear mandate and all to be expected second term at 2020; a conservative majority bench in the Supreme Court; Democrats will essential be rendered non-existent and impudent to rule  by Trump for the foreseeable future.

So either scenario will likely call for recounts, accusations of vote tampering, voter suppression, etc.; and not to forget mention of Russian influence.

No matter: there will definitely be violence of varying order of magnitude.

If violence escalates to an extreme level resulting in high death counts, and damage and loss of property; Trump may be obliged/willing/tempted to institute measures for Marshall Law to be put into effect, possibly, even before newly elected members can be sworn into Office.

This would provide him the perfect opportunity to suspend habeas corpus, rendering him free of constitutional limits. Trump could execute a coupe of the United States, rendering it a dictatorship with little to no resistance by members of his Cabinet, Department of Justice, Congress, Senate, and most critically: the Supreme Court! It would be a pivotal  moment in United States history, and degree to which democratic patriotism truly exists. But, most assuredly, a major civil battle would ensue.

In conclusion, only time’s passage will render a path to history’s making; it can only be hoped that civil disorder, and potential for chaos are condition of last resort.

 

 

07
Jul
18

The Tides of War?


The Oracle: the purveyor of things to come, prophecy rendered from the entrails of history’s telling.

The radical departure of Trump from his campaign rhetoric: to retreat from the historic United States’ hegemonic foreign policy, by his postings of Bolton and Pompeo, may be in anticipation of a major correction by the United States’ stock market toward the end of 2018, or early 2019, as detailed in the following report: https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/city-of-london-financiers-contemplate-imminent-2018-us-stock-market-crash-of-up-to-fifty-ed217752428 .

History has shown; when economies are on the verge of collapse, or significant recession/depression, war becomes a viable option as a diversion for the electorate. Having two war hawks in your War Cabinet in such a period of political turmoil would be advisable. Too, with the 2018 Mid-term elections on the horizon, this would bode well to gain support for a Republican House and Senate win. Trump has two irons in the fire to option his war strategy: Iran and North Korea. Given the complexity of a North Korea war venture, Iran is the most viable target allied by Israel first, and Saudi Arabia as a viable second. Great Britain’s Teresa May would relish a major conflict to divert attention away from the BREXIT fiasco and Angela Merkel, and France’s Macron have their own problems that seek a way out and opportunity to prolong their political careers (said cynically).

So all that said: the future may not be as bright as we may want it, get ready!

04
May
18

Who Are We To Believe?


FLAGS

Since the 2016 election of Trump, 45th President of the United States, a component to his winning campaign is the allegation that the Iranian nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), adopted by all participating nations of the United Nations Security Council in 2015, is a poorly negotiated agreement principally for reason that it would cease to curtail Iran from re-instituting its former nuclear weapons development, deemed to have ended as earlier as 2009, in fifteen years from date of its coming into effect.

Now, several months since his inauguration, during which period saw the hiring and firing of several senior members of his cabinet, Trump has strategically or otherwise, surrounded himself with well know Neocons such as John Robert Bolton, an American politician and attorney who is now National Security Advisor of the United States as of April 9, 2018. Bolton served as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations and widely known for his hawkish war posturing during the uptake to the attack on Iraq in 2003. And most recently, to replace fired Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, Trump has appointed Michael R. Pompeo, an American politician, lawyer, and former army officer to serve as the 70th United States Secretary of State. Previous to this appointment, he was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

The point of this essay is to highlight the political posturing and strategies being put into the public space by the media in preparation for President Trump’s decision to the future of the JCPOA, scheduled for on or before May 12, 2018, however, it is relevant to point out, at the present moment, the Trump presidency, and his administration’s credibility, is being challenged on the following three, widely publicized fronts:

  • First, domestically, is Special counsel, Robert Mueller’s and F.B.I.’s investigations related to purported Russian interference in his election campaign and more; and, the allegations related to a sexual affair with porn-star Stormy Daniels.
  • Second is North Korea: it’s leader Kim Jung Un’s highly publicized willingness to meet with Trump to negotiate for the dismantling of its nuclear missile program, to pursue re-unification with the South for the removal of economic stifling sanctions;
  • Third is Trump’s voiced threat to withdraw from the JCPOA with Iran if it is not renegotiated, to the satisfaction of the United States.

The need for Trump to divert public attention from the Mueller and F.B.I. investigations could suggest heightened emphasis, through media channels such as FOX News and conservative pundits, on the latter two major issues challenging the Trump administration.

Recent coverage of Kim Jung Un’s crossing of the North-South Demilitarized Zone to meet with South Korea’s President Moon Jae-In, in the latter part of April, 2018, is for the short term, de-emphasizing Trump’s role for the present moment, however, the appointment of Mike Pompeo, who has public voiced his discontent, and current mistrust of the North Korean regime’s willingness to dismantle its nuclear program for a lifting of sanctions and possible re-unification, has the potential to put that effort into jeopardy.

This leaves the United States posturing leading up to the self-imposed date of May 12, 2018 for its decision on the Iran deal (JCPOA).

To date, the leaders of all consenting countries to the JCPOA, have stated their continued support for the deal, and Iran’s compliance as demanded. The only dissenter is the United States and, to that end, the forces to make its case, now being front and center.

First, there is John Bolton, National Security Advisor. To firmly establish his advice on the JCPOA, is to Google or YouTube: “John Bolton on Iran deal” to view a litany of recent interviews where he states the case on behalf of the President. Here is one recent example: https://theintercept.com/2018/03/23/heres-john-bolton-promising-regime-change-iran-end-2018/

As early as July, 2017, Bolton tweeted: “Withdrawing from the Iran #NuclearDeal should be a top @realDonaldTrump administration priority.”

Most recently, in a move to discredit the Iranian governments role in the original negotiations, and its current commitment to meet its obligations as detailed by the JCPOA; Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, by way of YouTube video presentation, purports to have secured physical, documentary evidence, captured by Israeli secret services, that undeniably proves Iran lied leading up to the negotiated deal, and continues to deceive participating nations on its intent to reconstitute its nuclear ambitions, if not before the end of the fifteen year limitation.

Netanyahu Presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrPFH_KIqSc

In response to Netanyahu’s video claim is Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s Foreign Minister:

Iranian Foreign Minister: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHXpzHIwW1M

What should be of concern is the statement that Trump is prone to believing what Netanyahu is making claim to by his presentation even though the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), the watchdog to the advancement of nuclear development, has indicated Iran has been, and continues to be, compliant with the agreement contrary to that of the United States.

Trump in Agreement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aU2bckMD_g

IAEA Report of Key Events: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/iran/chronology-of-key-events

So, these are the facts as best known, and as conveyed, through the various public media platforms.

What is at stake is the potential for another contrived conflagration instigated by the United States premised upon unfounded, but highly publicized, misinformation, or is it?

The point to be made by this essay is to highlight the different claims being made on this very important issue, and to suggest who might have the most to gain, or lose, by the various, outcome potentials. Certainly, Iran and its Peoples stand to lose the most in much the same way those of Iraq, Libya, and currently Syria and Yemen have lost. But, for the United States, and its supporting allies, and their citizens; may be impacted by an increase in their taxes to pay for the carnage they seem willing to support being imposed on foreign nations’ regimes that are not willing to march to the tune of western governments, or at best, maybe just to serve as a major distraction to events occurring or not, domestically.

You decide who to believe!

FLAGS

 

 

 

01
Mar
18

The Millennial Challenge: Survival of the Species?


As the title infers, the present course of humanity on the planet is destined toward destruction: self-annihilation.  Whether this unwelcome end is manifest by the disastrous effects of climate-change or, equally as bad and potential: thermal nuclear war and the nuclear winter that will ensue.

Regardless of the mechanism, to thwart such potential happening, if there is a solution to be had, it is the Millennial generation, to this current epoch, to take affirmative and permanent action to manifest it.

Inspiring such a movement is Vice documentary production titled: `The Third Industrial Revolution: A Radical New Sharing Economy’ (https://youtu.be/QX3M8Ka9vUA) hosted by Jeremy Rifkin, American economic and social theorist, writer, public speaker, political adviser, and activist, who addresses an American audience of several millennial age men and women, detailing what amounts to a challenging road map to usher in a new economic system. A system presently hinting its way into the lexicon by way of such words as `block-chain’; `share-economy’; bio-system economy’; etc..

The hour and half is stark in Rifkin’s picture painted of the present state of global and earthly affairs detailed by the chronology of events initiated from the start of the 1st industrial revolution, through the second, and to where matters stand today. And the picture is not pretty nor is to where, if matters do not change dramatically, and soon, things are determined to get much worse.

What is clearly evident by way of Rifkin’s presentation; the European Union countries, led by example of Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel; and, China’s President, Xi Jinping; are leading their respective countries through revolutionary policy changes clearly established to lead them on the path to what he refers to as the `third industrial revolution’. And, simultaneously, asks: `where is the United States on this important issue?. And further, for that matter, by extension: all of North America and remaining regions of the world to address what is essentially a global problem demanding a global solution.

It is almost an imperative that those comprising the Millennial generation, supported by those of all previous generations, to watch, listen and respond to what Jeremy Rifkin details in this very informative and inspiring documentary.

In the United States, Millennials will have the opportunity to institute affirmative action by voting in the upcoming mid-term, November 2018 election to draft a new body of legislators, Senators and Congressman. Those acknowledged to be pro-active in the challenges, not solely on matters of climate-change, but too, a heightened awareness of the role smart technologies and systems of value exchange such as block-chain and crypto-currency/asset value exchange; AI infra-structure and autonomous technologies; construct of the share-economy, to ignite a new era of human r-evolution:`The Third Industrial Revolution: A Radical New Sharing Economy’.

In keeping with my typical voice being expressed in poetry; the following is a poem written early in 2010 acknowledging the state of matters then, that, eight years later, seems most appropriate to express in context of the revolution humanity is upon the threshold to embark:

R-evolution of Human-kind 

Only a handful of the world’s people are in the know

And what evil doings they do sow

And from it the hatred amongst all does grow

Question to be answered: What is their game?

And from it: What is the gain?

And by it: Who ultimately does the pain?

The saga of this siege has long been played

The life and blood of the masses is the price paid

When does it stop – when does it go away?

Populations of people are all getting smarter

No longer will they serve as the elite’s fodder

The uprising to come will undo this ongoing slaughter

A cataclysm will it take to break the slave chain

Only then will the people of the world take back their rightful claim

With actions taken to see it never happens again!

(Naykdpoet 2010)
 

08
May
17

Hypernormalisation


To better understand and comprehend the world as we are coming to know it, the reason for what is evolving, one need look at the history to what makes it so; and this comprehensive BBC documentary is a good start to that end:

08
May
17

Free Speech and Religious Liberty


Trump Administration’s Executive Order: `President Trump Signs the Executive Order on Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty‘ .

An Essay written in 2005 anticipated the potential negative outcome for many Americans given the growing, vocal presence of the Conservative Religious Right within the politic of the day.

The premise for the original essay is the offering of an open invitation to move to Canada, to those Americans who were becoming increasingly concerned for the positioning of the political and socially conservative, right-wing, evangelical religious movement to influence the White House and ultimately, the Supreme Court, to amend Constitutional laws in favor of their Bible-driven beliefs.

It would seem that day has finally materialized some twelve years later under the Trump-Pence Administration.

The original essay:

`IN GOD THEY TRUST – NBC with TOM BROKAW  (2005-10-23)

If you are a non-believer that is Christian, gay, democrat or liberal in your views and lastly, AMERICAN, Canada has a lot of vacant land available for occupancy whenever you are ready. And from what I saw and heard on this program, though a brief expose of what is gong on in the good old’ US, I would be looking to pack up and move real soon..

The infusion of evangelical religious fervour and the insidious means they employ to establish their faith amongst the many and subsequently the political pressure this puts on the State, the judicial system, it is cause for not only Americans but also, the rest of the world to be concerned.

The evangelical, conservative Christian movement is organized and determined to put their mark on the majority of America in order to shape the future direction of that country. Their coy manner of insisting that they do not have a political agenda, that they do not impose their theology on others is a ruse. They know what their objectives are and precisely how they expect to achieve those goals. And with their ally in the Oval Office – they are on the road to achieve those goals. With the Congress and eventually the Supreme Court weighted in their favour – the implication of this movement will outlive this administration. It is fearful to see and hear American citizens negating any sense of reason or judgement in exercising their right to vote. Regardless of the political aspirations or abilities of a political candidate be they for the presidency, congress or any other arm of the federal government, as long as that individual holds to their same right wing (though they would not label themselves as such), moral Christian values – that is where their vote will be directed. George W Bush is living proof of that commitment

The fear for the balance of Americans in success of this movement is how it translates to the rest of the world’s religious communities the most obvious of these being the Islamic faith who view the events in the United States as a furtherance of the Christian dominance of the world – at their expense. In addition, as has been brutally illustrated to date, they will sacrifice themselves to prevent this from happening.

The rift these events create within the social fabric of American society will have the affect of undermining the united front that up until the unfolding of these events can only serve the enemies of the US – what is the old adage – United we conquer – divided we fall.

Thank you CANADA!’

The invitation from this Canadian still stands!

 




Recent Posts

Categories