naykdpoet

Of the many issues in this earthly presence to confound any intellect of rational reason the latest has to do with the decades-old debate on the presence of unidentifiable flying objects (UFO’s) and, understandably, before you skip reading the rest of this article, please here me out.

As of late, with the advent of HUBBLE and most recently KEPLER deep-space observation telescopes, the media has been flush with reports of new found galaxy clusters, earth-like planets, etc., etc., suggesting that life, in some form, may exist elsewhere. Supporting these discoveries is a field of dedicated and seemingly rational, intelligent astronomical scientist and physicists who quake in their boots over such marvels of discovery giving high praise to advances in technology that allow such cosmic discovery.

Now here is where my mind goes into spasms for it can be stated emphatically: there are concrete irrefutable, documented evidence (just check out YouTube for the latest) that unfamiliar objects are occupying our skies ie UFO’s.  Whether the origins of these objects is extra-terrestial or not is open to debate but, assuming they are terrestial, of earth-based origin; why has this technology not been made public and utilized for the exploration of space in lieu of very expensive to build, deploy and maintain telescopes and roving robots that conjure more questions then are answered.
The suggestion here: things just do not add up.

Why would learned, intelligent individuals expend their entire careers exploring space for signs of life beyond Earth without at least exploring the presence, origin(s) and purpose to what millions of earth-citizens believe to be true: UFO’s do exist?  Are these scientists purposely blind to what has become pervasively self-evident?

It is increasingly obvious deception and misinformation are designed to keep 99 percent of humanity in the dark not only the topic of UFO’s but too, other equally important life affecting topics. A condition to any concerned citizen is disheartening. It leaves one to question: if the truth to reality; not in the esoteric sense, but in terms of day to day reality, does not exist, why adhere and conform to the principles that purport to sustain civil society?

In the end; what purpose is there in striving for something better when the environment in which we dwell is nothing more then a `fabricated lie’, an illusion?

Where is the disconnect?

  Reference: